The New Agriculture Network: Farmers, researchers and educators teaming up for sustainable and organic solutions in the Great Lakes region New Ag Network home
New Ag sidebar

The New Agriculture Network's on-line newsletter with seasonal advice for field crop and vegetable growers interested in organic agriculture.

Vol. 3, No. 12 October 11, 2006

In this issue

bulletNEW: Soybean aphid eggs plentiful  
bullet It’s not all in the bag: fresh and processed salad greens  
bullet Using compost to reduce irrigation  
Some observations about soybean aphid  
bullet Raising Vegetables and Civic Values: CSA in the 21st Century  
bullet Organics symposium proceedings available  
bullet News briefs from the American Farmland Trust  

This is our final issue for 2006. Our next issue will be posted April 2007.
Farmers and others – send us your comments or suggestions to improve the New Agriculture Network in 2007: newagnet@msu.edu. Have a great winter.

Read previous issues through our calendar of issues.

It’s not all in the bag: fresh and processed salad greens
Shari L. Plimpton, Ph.D.
Program Manager - Industry Outreach
CIFT/EISC, Inc.

As growers respond to increasing demand for both fresh produce and convenience, they find themselves in unfamiliar territory and at risk of violating food law. What could go wrong? Consumers want more fresh produce for the obvious health benefits and growers want to provide quality fresh produce safely, economically and with convenience.

Working to meet those consumer demands for safety, economy and convenience can lead a grower into considering packaging methods, such as bagging, that begin to cross the line between growing and packing fresh produce and entering into the more heavily regulated (and riskier) realm of food processing. However, simply putting the produce in a bag is not enough to call a product “processed.” Crossing that line is a risk that growers need to understand regardless of whether they choose to grow under organic certification, use sustainable farming methods or follow conventional agriculture techniques.

Who can forget the most recent outbreak of E. coli O157: H7 in bagged salad with approximately 200 confirmed sick from that outbreak and at least two deaths? And this from a packing operation in the Salinas Valley of California, the “Salad Bowl of America” that packed both organic and conventionally grown-bagged salads. While E. coli has been detected in the suspect bagged spinach, far more testing will be done before the root cause of this outbreak is identified, if ever. Irrigation water is suspected, particularly because E. coli has been detected in the rivers and creeks that feed the irrigation canals in the Salinas Valley in the past. Even more recently, E. coli has been detected in irrigation water used for green leaf lettuce grown near Salinas prompting the FDA to issue a notice of recall of a specific brand of green leaf lettuce.

In the same notice of the green leaf recall, the FDA repeated its assertion that, “Fresh leafy greens grown and consumed in the United States are safe.  Every year there are many thousands of pounds of fresh leafy greens such as lettuce and spinach grown in the United States and consumed by the public with no consequent illness.” So what’s going on and what is a grower to do to minimize the risk and help prevent future outbreaks?

Well let’s start with the bacteria known as E. coli O157: H7. E. coli itself is a class and genus of bacteria that are part of the group known as coliforms and are grown and spread via human and animal intestinal tracts. The presence of coliforms in general and E. coli in particular in the water, soil, on packing surfaces or within and without the plant is taken as a strong indicator that there has been fecal contamination. Growers, when testing water, should be testing for total coliforms and E. coli specifically. E. coli O157:H7 as a specific strain is of great concern because of its intense impact on human health. E. coli O157:H7 will, with relatively low numbers of infecting cells, cause gastrointestinal illness and potentially lead to a form of kidney failure known as HUS that can result in kidney damage and potentially death. Infants and young children, the elderly and others with compromised immune systems, are particularly vulnerable to this type of infection.

In previous articles both for this publication and others (information on obtaining copies of previous articles is given below), I have described the steps necessary to develop food safety programs for fresh produce. The purpose of these programs is to prevent contamination from E. coli and other pathogenic microorganisms. We don’t have room to repeat everything in this article so I will emphasize the main points:

  • Look at your entire operation – from the land to the final storage and transportation – with an eye out for potential contamination.
  • Monitor water quality for irrigation, sprays, washing and related packing activities for potential pathogens. Use potable water and a sanitizer in all wash water.
  • Train for and strongly encourage worker hygiene including hand washing in the field as well as after harvest.
  • Provide adequate and clean sanitary facilities including access to potable water, soap and disposable towels for hand washing.
  • Manage manure by composting and timing applications under accepted practices for the GAPs (Good Agricultural Practices) program.
  • Exclude animals (both domestic and wild), pests and vermin from your fields, packing facilities, storage and transportation as much as is practicable.

All of this and more GAPs are part of reducing the risk of food borne illness for fresh produce. And at this time, none of these practices are required by regulation, but are recommended by the FDA and supported by the USDA to avoid crossing the line into regulation by selling fresh produce that is considered “adulterated.” Finding that a food has become adulterated (that is contaminated in a way that is injurious to human health) gives the FDA jurisdiction to investigate in cooperation with the CDC, state and local authorities. Under the suspicion of adulteration, the FDA can then recommend a recall, and can potentially work to file charges resulting in the issuance of warrants and potential seizure of the suspected food. So, it would appear that other than weights and measures, EPA regulations, labor laws, and potential requirements for local or state inspections, the only other regulatory concern for the fresh produce grower is to avoid adulteration.

Many growers in their efforts to improve the convenience of fresh produce (an attempt that may seem excessive for those of us who already consider fresh produce pretty convenient) will consider different types of bags, trays and other packaging methods. Bags and trays in and of themselves do not enter regulatory territory unless they become a source of contamination. Crossing the line from FDA and state recommended practices into FDA and state regulated food processing occurs when the cutting and trimming of fresh produce goes beyond the point of simply removing dead leaves and similar debris. Food processing occurs when cutting, peeling or tearing of the edible portion of the plant in any way results in the plant tissue becoming more vulnerable to bacterial infection and growth. Crossing that line results in the requirement for registering the facility, following FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices, establishing washing and packing operations that are both sanitary and capable of yielding an unadulterated food product, state or local inspections, regulatory requirements for a food safety program (preferably HAACP based), and often operating in a certified processing facility or kitchen.

Tips about  whether produce is considered fresh or processed
Examples of practices that keep the product in the category of fresh produce are:
Trimming the silk and stem and/or removing outer leaves and silk
Washing and waxing apples
Trimming off dead leaves or stems from celery stalks
Trimming the greens off the tops of carrots, and removing roots during cleaning
Removing dead or damaged outer leaves of cabbage or heads of lettuce.

Examples of practices that are considered within the realm of food processing and therefore under higher regulatory standards for good manufacturing practices are:
Slicing apples
Separating and trimming the celery stalks
Trimming or peeling the carrots resulting in exposed carrot flesh
Coring or separating and cutting the leaves from cabbage or leafy greens.

The key to all practices that result in the requirement to adhere to state and FDA food processing regulations is the increased risk of pathogen contamination and growth. It is not simply the act of putting produce in a bag or tray. Bacteria that cause food borne illness like nothing better then a warm, moist environment with lots of open, damaged fruit or vegetable cells to grow on. And simply cooling the product is not enough to prevent food borne illness. These bacteria are adaptable and can survive cold temperatures, ready to commence growth and increase food borne illness risks once the packaged produce has left the grower’s control. That’s why operations that produce bagged salads of all types are regulated as food manufacturing facilities registered, certified and inspected as required by law. We have also developed the expectation that these operations provide a step or steps in their sanitary food processing operation that will not only prevent contamination during the process, but also reduce the number of potential contaminants in the bagged product prior to or during packing.

What about farm markets?
Selling produce through a farm or farmers’ market presents the same type of regulatory expectations, although different agencies and regulations can become involved depending on whether the produce is processed on site in some way, or packaged on the farm and then sold through the market. Simply put, if it involves trimming and cutting of the edible portion, and packaging in the packing facility, it will always be considered processed food and falls under the FDA and related state regulations. If the produce is cut and trimmed at the market and sold as food for immediate consumption, then the local and state authorities exercise jurisdiction under the food service laws and regulations for that state, which often include kitchen certification and person-in-charge training requirements.

Hopefully you get a better idea of when a food is considered fresh produce and when it becomes a processed food product as defined by the FDA. If you have any doubt about where your produce stands, please contact your local and state authorities to get their input on what you are required to do based on your operation’s practices. Far better that they help you operate within the arena of fresh produce then to find out that you are expected to recall your product and close your facility because you are in fact creating a processed food and have failed to follow regulatory requirements, including the requirement to register your packaging facility.

For more help and articles regarding implementing Good Agricultural Practices and related topics please go to www.midamservices.org, on the left margin select “Projects,” and then on the Projects page select “Ohio and Indiana Specialty Crop Food Safety initiative.” At the bottom of the page you will find a link to “Produce Food Safety Technical Articles.” While the USDA Risk Management Agency funding for the initiative has ceased as of Sept. 30, 2006, MAAHS will maintain the website so growers can access those articles and related useful links. Consultation for GAPs, developing food safety programs and passing third party audits will be available through the Center for Innovative Food Technology (CIFT.) You can reach them by calling either Shari at 614-314-4627 or emailing shari-plimpton@eisc.org. More information is also available by calling Jennifer Hungerford of MidAmerican Agricultural Services, Inc. (MAAHS) at 614-246-8289.

  back to top
line
Using compost to reduce irrigation

Duane Friend
University of Illinois Extension
Natural Resources Management Educato
As energy costs continue to rise, producers are looking for ways to reduce these costs.  Some studies suggest that compost has the potential to improve soil moisture retention to the point that supplemental irrigation can be decreased.
           
A study in central Wisconsin (Foley and Cooperband) examined short- and intermediate-term use of compost and other organic amendments in sandy soils in that part of the state. Compost was applied at rates of 10 tons per acre and 20 tons per acre on plots planted to potatoes and snap beans. Following the second year of application, the amount of water available to plants in these plots increased by five to 45 percent compared to plots with no compost application. The amendments improved pore size distribution, decreasing the larger pores and increasing the smaller ones. These findings suggest that under these conditions, irrigation water needs could be reduced by 10 to 90 percent, or three to seven cycles per season.
           
Using these findings we can determine potential energy cost savings with an irrigation cost program from Kansas State University.  This software program allows the user to input irrigation costs using several energy sources – propane, electricity, diesel and natural gas – for a center pivot irrigation system. The program also accounts for other variables including inches of water applied, acres covered by the system, pressure of the system and the number of feet the water is lifted. 
graph
 
Now, let’s look at a specific example using numbers that would apply for a center pivot system in Mason County, Illinois, an area that extensively irrigates. At existing energy prices it is estimated that energy savings in the Mason County area would be $400 to $4,200 per year on a 130-acre system, depending on the energy source used and the number of cycles reduced.

A lab study done by University of Illinois Extension specialists took different ratios of sandy loam soil and compost and examined changes in plant-available water.  Ratios ranged from 100 percent sandy loam (no compost) to 100 percent compost (no soil).  These studies suggested that any of the mixtures including compost essentially doubled the amount of plant-available water compared to the soil without compost.  Increasing the amount of compost did increase overall soil water retention, but more of the water was held below the wilting point, making it unavailable for plant use.
image
image

One important aspect of the Wisconsin study is that the benefits received from applying compost and other amendments decreases over time unless additional applications are made. As the organic material decomposes, the amount of retained soil water and plant-available water also decreases.
           
The bottom line is this: in areas where supplemental irrigation is necessary for crops to thrive, producers may want to consider using compost to reduce irrigation costs.

For more information on compost and this topic, visit these web sites:
http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/pr_irrigate/Software/Irrsoftware.htm
http://envirovaluation.org/index.php?title=biocycle_
www_jgpress_com_biocycle_htm_1&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
  back to top
line
Some observations about soybean aphid

Christina DiFonzo
Entomology
Michigan State University

Editor’s note: MSU Entomologist Christina DiFonzo sent this message recently to MSUE educators. We are sharing it here for your information.

On Sunday/Monday (October 1-2), there was a huge flight of soybean aphid gynoparae (winged females) from soybeans to buckthorn. On Monday (October 2), I found females with tiny newly-deposited nymphs on every buckthorn shrub I examined around MSU. Many of these were ant-tended (i.e. being protected), and I didn't see any ladybugs or other predators. These nymphs will mature into oviparae and lay eggs in October.  Suction trap catches throughout Michigan in September have been "0", but I expect that the trap catch from this week will have soybean aphids.  Heavy aphid numbers were also reported this week in Ontario and Ohio (apparently from the same flight), and last week from Indiana, Illinois and Minnesota.

Thus early indications point to higher soybean aphid populations in 2007.

  back to top
line
Raising Vegetables and Civic Values: CSA in the 21st Century

Susan Smalley,
Extension Specialist
C.S. Mott Group for Sustainable Food Systems,
Michigan State University
What: The Second Biennial Conference for Community Supported Agriculture.
When: November 10-12, 2006
Where: Kettunen Center near Tustin, Michigan (Just south of Cadillac, Mich.)
Contact:  CSA-MI, 3480 Potter Rd., Bear Lake, MI 49614. Toll free phone: 877-526-1441. Email: csafarm@jackpine.net
Website: http://csafarms.org/csafarms4056869.asp
Direct link to scholarship information: http://csafarms.org/csafarms7462042.asp

The workshop schedule is nearing completion, the keynoters are getting their presentations ready and the mini-school curriculum is being hammered out. Check the website periodically for updates on the program, speakers and other details.  

The best news is that we have a regional SARE grant to help farmers with the costs of the program. Nearly 50 participants (more if some other grant money comes through) can benefit from this program. You can apply by going to the website and downloading the application form (look in the conference section of the site for 'financial assistance' or click on http://csafarms.org/csafarms7462042.asp). Contact us direct with your mailing address for a printed copy.

In addition to the farmer scholarships, we have scholarship support for agricultural professionals -- Extension, NRCS, MDA, FSA, etc. -- who are interested in learning more about CSA so that they can better support farmers in CSA ventures.  Contact Susan Smalley, smalley3@msu.edu, if you are interested in an ag professional scholarship.
  back to top
line
Organics symposium proceedings available
Phil Bogdan


Plant Management Network
The proceedings of the symposium, “Organic Agriculture: Innovations in Organic Marketing, Technology and Research,” is now publicly available through Crop Management, an online journal of the Plant Management Network. A total of 18 presentations across six themes are explored including 1) challenges remaining in the organic sector, 2) producer options and obstacles, 3) market growth, 4) the training of farmers and other agricultural professionals, 5) measuring and communicating the benefits of organic farming, and 6) research. 
    
The United States Department of Agriculture, in conjunction with other organizations in the public and private sectors, sponsored the symposium to explore potential gaps in research and support for organic growers and others in the supply chain.

“The most important thing the symposium did was to clearly show the gaps in our understanding and knowledge about organic markets, research, and organic farming systems,” said Carolee Bull, a research scientist with the USDA Agricultural Research Service and member of the symposiums coordinating committee.

Its amazing that organic agriculture has been as successful as it has been in spite of all the gaps that were identified,” said Bull. “That is probably a direct result of the tenacity of organic farmers and the consumers who want organic products. More and more consumers want to be a part of this and, therefore, it is as important for them to know about these issues--as it is for marketers, researchers, growers, government policymakers and university administrators,” she said.

Bull said the collaborative effort was a significant development in the organics industry.
She found the symposium to be an interesting example of agencies and private-public partnering to produce a set of information that isn’t available anywhere else.

The Plant Management Network, www.plantmanagementnetwork.org, is a cooperative not-for-profit resource for the applied plant and agricultural sciences.

  back to top
line
News briefs from American Farmland Trust Bringing local healthy food to school cafeterias
Farm-to-school programs are sprouting up nationwide as more and more schools connect with local farms. The programs work to serve healthy meals in school cafeterias, improve student health and provide nutrition education, all while supporting local agriculture. The schools buy and feature farm fresh foods like fruits and vegetables, providing farmers with access to new markets through schools. Currently, the federal government spends billions of dollars to subsidize grains and other crops while providing almost no support for fruits and vegetables. AFTs recommendations for the 2007 Farm Bill include support for initiatives like farm-to school programs that promote healthier diets [PDF] and increase demand for specialty crops and locally grown food.

Saving land still saves money
Cost of Community Services (COCS) studies, a snapshot in time of costs versus revenues for each type of land use, have been conducted in at least 125 communities across the United States. A subset of the much larger field of fiscal analysis, AFTs COCS studies have emerged as an inexpensive and reliable tool to measure direct fiscal relationships. The studies help local officials and citizens make informed land use and policy decisions about saving land.

2007 Steward of the Land Award – nominate someone deserving
Nominations are now being accepted for American Farmland Trusts 2007 Steward of the Land Award.

  back to top

Soybean aphid eggs plentiful

Christina DiFonzo
Michigan State University Entomology

I would like to pass along the latest on soybean aphid over-wintering. Purdue’s Bob O'Neill and Dave Voegtlin (operator of  the suction trap network at University of Illinois) did their annual fall buckthorn survey at the end of October. They drove from Urbana, IL, across Indiana to Toledo, OH, north to Cabelas in Michigan’s Monroe County, then back across southern Michigan to Chicago. They report finding the most soybean aphid eggs they have ever seen on buckthorn – even more than the fall of 2004. 

Dave took this picture showing eggs upon eggs on a buckthorn bud this fall. (Posted at this web site November 13, 2006)

  back to top
Funding to initiate this network was provided by the American Farmland Trust
and EPA Region 5.
Web site is hosted by the MSU IPM Program.
Contact webmaster.
MSU Integrated Pest Management Program
New Ag Network web site.