Integrated pest management resources for Michigan Michigan State University home IPM Michigan home

Search

Christmas trees
Field Crops
Fruit
Home and yard
Nursery and landscape
Turfgrass
Vegetable


Diagnostic Services
Soil/Plant Nutrient Lab
Ag weather
Regional IPM Center
Pesticide safety
Organic: New Ag Network
Invasive species
Sustainable ag & food systems


MSU ANR departments
MSU Extension

Site index
Contacts/permissions

Greenhouse Alert newsletter
Greenhouse Alert home
Contact an agent
Floriculture AoE Team
Print or view text only

No. 8, April 11, 2007
 

In this issue
Does botrytis have you feeling too warm and fuzzy?
Grant and loan opportunities for greenhouse energy projects

 

Does botrytis have you feeling too warm and fuzzy?
Mary Hausbeck
Plant Pathology

The disease
Stem, leaf and flower blights caused by the fungus, Botrytis cinerea, can limit all phases of ornamental production. Botrytis is well known for its ability to produce large masses of gray conidia (also called spores, see below) that may be picked up and carried on air currents and transported to healthy plants where blight can become established. Monitoring the occurrence and build-up of this inoculum in the greenhouse can signal the need for implementing control measures. On bedding and stock plants, Botrytis typically becomes established and produces spores on aging lower leaves that are near the moist soil surface and under the plant canopy. In addition, Botrytis readily infects the broken or cut stem surface of stock plants and progresses downward, causing a dieback of the entire stem. This diseased tissue offers another source of nutrients necessary to produce spores.

Choosing fungicides
Fungicides are often important in managing Botrytis and should be chosen carefully. Each year, Michigan State University tests products for control of Botrytis blight. Geraniums are good test plants because they seem to be a “magnet” for this disease. All fungicides are applied and allowed to dry prior to introducing Botrytis spores.  Each time a test is conducted, fungicides that are considered especially effective are included for a comparison. Over the years of testing fungicides for Botrytis control, I consider Decree, Chipco 26 GT and fungicides containing chlorothalonil (Daconil and Echo) standards because they consistently provide effective control. We were interested in comparing the fungicides Compass, Terraguard 50W and Fungo 50WSB against these standards. Compass is a fairly new product and is often recommended for control of powdery mildew. Terraguard is also a strong powdery mildew fungicide when applied as a spray. It can also be used as a drench for some root rots. Fungo 50WSB has thiophanate-methyl as its active ingredient and is effective against a number of foliar blights and root rots.

In our trial, Botrytis progressed and produced spores on nearly 40 percent of the foliage that was left untreated (see graph). Overall, the standards, including Echo 720, 26 GT, Daconil Weatherstik and Decree 50WDG, provided good protection and kept disease to less than 10  percent. Compass + Latron B-1956 offered Botrytis control, but was not always as effective as the standard fungicides. It is helpful to know that Compass is not only a strong powdery mildew fungicide, but can also suppress Botrytis. Terraguard 50W, even at a high rate, was not especially helpful in this trial in managing Botrytis blight. The inability of Fungo 50WSB to limit Botrytis in our trial may be due to resistance of our particular Botrytis strain to this fungicide. Due to the frequency of Botrytis isolates that are resistant to benzimidazoles (examples are Cleary’s 3336, Fungo), these fungicides are no longer recommended as the primary tool for controlling Botrytis. Although resistance to the systemic dicarboximide fungicides (Chipco 26 GT) has also been documented, resistance does not appear to be widespread, and if used wisely, they should continue to be effective. Rotating dicarboximide fungicides with protectant fungicides (Daconil, Decree, Phyton-27, Exotherm Termil, Echo, Dithane are examples) is a traditional way of delaying the buildup of resistant isolates. Protectant fungicides do not appear to be at great risk of developing resistance. However, these protectant fungicides may not be as effective as the dicarboximide fungicides. Moorman and Lease (1992, Plant Disease 76:374-376) at The Pennsylvania State University determined that tank mixtures of systemic and protectant fungicides provided good control of Botrytis and lasted longer than applications of single fungicides.

Many growers have asked about ZeroTol for Botrytis control and two different treatment programs were included. In our trial, Botrytis blighted over 30 percent of the foliage that was left untreated (see graph). The Daconil Weather Stik 6SC standard provided good protection and kept disease to less than 1  percent. The unregistered fungicides Fluazinam 500F, Boscalid 70WG, and Captan 80WDG all limited disease to 4 percent or less and performed in a way that was comparable to Daconil Weather Stik 6SC. Repeated applications of Fluazinam appeared to cause some yellowing of the geraniums’ leaves and requires additional testing. Using ZeroTol to control Botrytis was not especially helpful in this particular trial.

Identifying new fungicides that could be registered for use on ornamentals has been a major thrust of the research sponsored by the Special Floriculture Initiative of the USDA Agricultural Research Service and the American Floral Endowment. With data from screening trials, University researchers can partner with the product manufacturer, interested growers and the IR-4 Project (www.ir4.rutgers.edu) to initiate and speed registration. Input from growers regarding their need for pest management tools is encouraged and appreciated and can be made via the IR-4 website.

Sanitation and the environment are important, too
Fungicides cannot do the job by themselves; environmental manipulation and sanitation are necessary partners in a successful program. Since Botrytis requires specific environmental conditions in order to cause disease and produce conidia, control can be achieved by manipulating the environment, making it unfavorable for Botrytis establishment.

Grow plants in a well-ventilated, low relative humidity (<85 percent) environment.
Increase plant spacing. A less dense plant canopy will allow air circulation and thorough fungicide coverage.
Minimize the hours that the foliage is wet by watering in the morning so the foliage dries by the evening.
Reduce the relative humidity for a minimum of 24 hours immediately following the harvesting of cuttings to help “dry” the wounded stems and thereby limit stem blight.

Sanitation also plays a role in disease management. Botrytis readily colonizes and produces conidia in senescent or dead plant debris. Therefore, remove plant debris on and underneath plant benches that could serve as a reservoir for sporulating Botrytis.

Acknowledgement
This research was funded by the USDA/ARS through a Specific Cooperative Agreement as part of the Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative.
back to top

 

Grant and loan opportunities for greenhouse energy projects
Erik Runkle
Horticulture


The USDA Rural Development Office recently announced funding that is available for greenhouse growers and other agricultural industries to support investments in energy-efficiency improvements and renewable energy. Available funding includes $176.5 million in loan guarantees and almost $11.4 million in grants available to small businesses nationwide.

The Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency loan and grant program was established under Section 9006 of the 2002 Farm Bill to encourage agricultural businesses located in rural areas to create or install renewable energy systems and energy efficiency improvements. Eligible projects include investments in anaerobic digesters, biomass boilers and burners, solar collectors, wind energy and energy efficiency improvements. Examples of energy efficiency projects include the installation of more energy-efficient motors, pumps, fans, ventilation systems, insulation, and heating and lighting systems.

Grants can cover up to 25 percent of total eligible costs. The minimum energy efficiency grant is $1,500 and maximum is $250,000. The minimum renewable energy grant is $2,500 and maximum is $500,000. Guaranteed loans can cover up to 50 percent of the total eligible cost. Loan limits are a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $10 million.

Applications for grants must be completed and submitted to the USDA Rural Development State Office or Area Offices, postmarked no later than May 18. Applications must be submitted no later than July 2 for guaranteed loan applications or loan/grant combinations.

For more information in Michigan, contact Rick Vanderbeek at (517) 324-5157 in East Lansing, Paula Gromak at (989) 673-8173, ext. 120 in Caro, or Lori Krause at (906) 428-1060, ext. 112 in the Upper Peninsula. In addition, visit the Energy Grants and Loans webpage on the MSU Floriculture AoE Team’s website for supplemental information.

back to top
The MSU IPM Program maintains this site as an access point to pest management information at MSU. The IPM Program is administered within the Department of Entomology, fueled by research from the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, delivered to citizens through MSU Extension, and proud to be a part of Project GREEEN.
Email
the web developer.
x