|
Broad mite showing up in
greenhouses now
Dave Smitley,
Entomology and
Thomas Dudek, MSU Extension Horticulture Agent
|
This past week we have had several cases of broad
mite damage to New Guinea impatiens, ipomea, thunbergia, and gerbera.
Broad mites are closely related to cyclamen mites. Plants most likely
to have broad mites are peppers, dahlia, zinnia, chrysanthemum,
and numerous perennials, but they are occasionally found on many
other plants.
Broad mites are tiny, white or clear mites, only
half the size of spider mites (0.1 to 0.3 mm). They are difficult
to see without a microscope. Broad mites feed on the undersides
of leaves and in new flower and leaf buds and shoots. Leaves and
flowers usually turn brown or black where they have been feeding.
Infested leaves may also be cracked or curled. They reproduce rapidly,
completing a life cycle in four to five days in warm weather. Broad
mites require high relative humidity for their survival. Damage
is usually first noticed as a disfiguration, cupping, curling, or
browning of new shoots, terminals or edges of leaves.
The distorted leaves can be very hard in texture compared
to a normal leaf. If broad mites are found, infested plants can
be treated with Floramite or Avid. The new growth taking place after
a miticide treatment should be healthy.
|
|
Medallion® applications
on zonal geranium
Matthew Blanchard and Erik Runkle
Horticulture
|
Medallion 50WP (fludioxonil) fungicide is often
recommended on geraniums for control of certain foliar and soil
borne diseases such as aerial blight (Rhizoctonia
spp.), alternaria leaf spot (Alternaria
spp.), fusarium stem and root rot (Fusarium
spp.), and rhizoctonia stem and root rot (Rhizoctonia
spp.). In 2003, a few
greenhouse growers expressed concerns on the sensitivity of some
geranium cultivars when Medallion 50WP was applied.
Growers observed stunting and chlorosis on some cultivars
following drench applications. We performed an experiment with three application
methods and three rates of Medallion 50WP on zonal geranium to document
potential phytotoxicity resulting from these applications.
Rooted cuttings of
zonal geranium 'Blues 2001' and 'Tango' were transplanted into 5-inch
square pots filled with a commercial soiless medium on July 8, 2003.
Plants were grown at 68°F under a natural photoperiod and treated
with Medallion 50WP using one of three application methods:
1)
Drench application -- solution was applied to wet all of
the growing media.
2)
Spray application -- solution was applied as a foliar spray
to runoff.
3)
Irrigation application -- solution was applied as a combination
drench and spray.
Three different rates were used for each application method: 1.0,
2.0, and 4.0 oz/100 gallons (see accompanying protocol summary). All treatments received two applications that
were made 28 days apart on August 22 and September 19, 2003, at approximately
4:00 PM.
Application protocol for
Pelargonium 'Blues 2001'
and Tango® violet
|
Treatment
|
Rate
Oz./100 gallons
|
|
Control
|
-
|
|
Drench
|
1.0
|
|
Drench
|
2.0
|
|
Drench
|
4.0
|
|
Spray
|
1.0
|
|
Spray
|
2.0
|
|
Spray
|
4.0
|
|
Irrigation
|
1.0
|
|
Irrigation
|
2.0
|
|
Irrigation
|
4.0
|
Plant foliage was visually evaluated for symptoms of phytotoxicity
7 and 14 days after applications using a scale of 1 to 3 (1=severe,
2=moderate, 3=no visual damage).
A visual root evaluation was conducted on October 2, 2003,
13 days after second application using a scale of 1 to 3 (1=small
root mass with or without brown roots, 2=moderate stunting and browning,
3=large mass of white roots). Photographs of plants from each treatment were taken concurrently
with visual evaluations.
Foliar symptoms of phytotoxicity were not observed until five to seven
days after the second application. The amount of phytotoxicity observed on both cultivars was dependent
on application method and rate (Figure
1 and Figure 2). The application of Medallion as a foliar spray
resulted in the least amount of phytotoxicity symptoms compared with
drench and irrigation applications.
However, at the 4 oz/100 gallon rate, some phytotoxicity symptoms
were observed with foliar spray applications.
Medallion applied as an irrigation application
resulted in the greatest phytotoxicity with all concentration rates
as compared with other application methods.
Drench applications resulted in moderate symptoms of phytotoxicity
at all application rates. The
control treatment displayed no symptoms of phytotoxicity and served
as a comparison for the three application methods and rates.
A correlation was seen on plants with severe symptoms of phytotoxicity
and the amount of root stunting.
For example, on zonal geranium 'Blues 2001,' 4 oz. irrigation
treatment with severe visual foliar damage also displayed moderate
root stunting (Figure 3). Differences between the two cultivars were
observed on drench and irrigation treatments.
The drench treatment caused more phytotoxicity on Tango®
violet, while phytotoxicity from the irrigation application
treatment was more severe on 'Blues 2001.'
These results indicate that Medallion 50WP applied twice as an
irrigation treatment (contact with foliage and roots) causes phytoxicity
on the two cultivars tested. Foliar
spray and soil drench applications may cause stunting or chlorosis
on some cultivars of zonal geraniums at higher rates.
Syngenta Professional Products Corp., the manufacturer of
Medallion 50WP, has recently revised the label and removed geranium
from the list of plants on which Medallion has been tested and found
to be safe. Syngenta has
stated that due to the lower tolerance of geranium to misapplication
and higher use rates, this label change was necessary. The label now includes a warning statement and a recommendation
for testing Medallion on a small number of plants to evaluate for
any possible phytotoxicity before proceeding with widespread use.
The revised EPA approved
label for Medallion 50WP can be found at: http://www.syngentacropprotection-us.com/pdf/labels/SCP769BL1B0303.pdf
|
|
Will you pass an MDA/EPA
WPS compliance check?
Jeanne Himmelein
Extension Horticultural Agent
|
Can you believe it's been 12 years since we learned
about the Federal Worker Protection Standard?
You were trained a few years ago about what you needed to
do, what your facility requires, and what your employees need to
know to meet the mandatory requirements with this federal law. As
I've been in the greenhouses this spring, I've noticed that some
of you have made some changes to your facility and the Central Notification
Documents are missing or parts of them are not there.
I then ask myself, myself, "Do you think the handlers have
reviewed the handler training book lately? Are
treated areas being properly posted? Are
pesticide applications being properly documented? Have all of the employees completed the pesticide
safety training?"
I thought it was time to remind you of the importance
of WPS and to make sure you and your employees are following the
law since MDA is out checking facilities for compliance and rumor
has it that they may be fining greenhouses that are not compliant.
I would hate for you to not be in compliance and be fined.
Here is a checklist
(in pdf) of requirements for you to print and do a mini compliance
evaluation yourself.
If you need to replace documents or training tools,
Gemplers (http://www.gemplers.com/
or 800-382-8473) has the documents needed for central posting, training
booklets, training flip charts, worker, handler and trainers notebooks
and the signs for posting areas that are not to be entered. Society
of American Florists (SAF) has the training video as well as the
booklets. You can check their web site for ordering information at: http://www.safnow.org/ or call (800) 336-4743
for a catalog.
If you have questions, feel free to contact your
MSU Extension Agent, we will
be more than happy to help you.
|