Christina DiFonzo, Entomology
With the recent rains, slugs are common in some fields. Slugs feed on cotyledons, stems and leaves of emerging plants by scraping the leaf surface. With heavy damage, leaves take on a tattered appearance. Wet conditions favor slug populations, thus no-and reduced till fields with residue are at greater risk for slug feeding, especially if plants are emerging and growing slowly. Slugs are hidden during the day, but silvery slime trails may visible. To check for slugs, move residue aside during the day or walk fields at night. Another trick is to put something flat (like old shingles) out in the field overnight, by daybreak, slugs often accumulate on the underside. Seed treatments do not control slugs. Baits containing metaldehyde are very effective, but expensive. Drying conditions and good crop growth are the best solution to a slug problem.
Phil Kaatz from Lapeer County visited a wireworm-damaged field this week, only to find millipedes as the true culprit (view photo). This is a rare, but increasing find, in parts of Ontario, Indiana and Michigan. A few years ago, several wet fields near the Tittabawassee River in Saginaw County lost stand due to millipede feeding. In all cases, the affected fields are wet and have a lot of crop residue. Millipedes are normally beneficial, feeding on decaying plant material, but under unusual conditions they can damage seeds and emerging plants. Millipedes are distinguished from other long, brown insects (such as wireworms) by being “leggy,” with four legs on each body segment. “Milli” means a thousand in Latin, and “ped” means foot, thus literally “a thousand-feet.” Millipedes are not insects, and seed treatments do not seem to impact them. As with slugs, drying conditions and good crop growth are the solution to overcoming a millipede infestation. |
back to top |
| |
Christina DiFonzo, Entomology
A few people contacted me to ask about a recent EPA decision to allow a “natural” refuge for resistance management in Bt cotton. Because there may be some confusion about how this relates to Bt corn, here are some details of the story.
Bollgard II is a stacked, transgenic cotton that produces two different Bt toxins, Cry2Ab2 and Cry1Ac. These Bt toxins control two important cotton pests, bollworm and tobacco budworm. In the past, producers using Bollgard II cotton were required to plant a certain percentage of acres to non-Bt cotton to manage insect resistance. In “government-speak,” this type of man-made refuge is called a “structured” refuge. Most of you are familiar with structured refuges, because they are also required when you plant Bt corn for European corn borer or corn rootworm control.
The Bollgard II cotton situation is a bit different from Bt corn. Since Bollgard II produces two Bt toxins, its efficacy (kill off pest caterpillars) is very high. If a caterpillar survives one Bt toxin, it is presumably killed by the other toxin. The assumption is that the chance of producing a resistant moth is extremely low, less than for transgenic cottons producing only a single Bt toxin. Also, bollworm and budworm have many alternate host plants, other crops as well as weeds. The assumption is that caterpillars growing on the other hosts are not exposed to Bt, thus the alternate crops and weeds act as a “natural” refuge for susceptible insects. Based on the high efficacy and alternate hosts, Monsanto petitioned EPA to drop the structured refuge requirement in favor of a natural refuge. EPA approved this change for Bollgard II cotton planted from east Texas into the mid-Atlantic region. In other words, cotton growers in these states do not have to plant a refuge. However, the structured refuge remains in effect for Bollgard II planted in the west.
What does this mean for Bt corn refuges? Nothing. The “natural” refuge only applies to one type of cotton planted in the eastern United States. Structured refuges (20 percent non-Bt corn in Michigan) are still required for corn borer and rootworm corn to manage insect resistance. The refuge needs to be planted adjacent to (rootworm) or within a half mile (corn borer) of the Bt field. Ideally, refuge and Bt acres should be planted at the same time and managed in a similar fashion. However, the use of a natural refuge in cotton may spur discussion and research into natural refuges for other crops. |
back to top |
| |
Christy Sprague
Crop & Soil Sciences
Early season weed competition may be one of the biggest contributors to unseen yield losses in soybean. Appropriately timing postemergence herbicide applications is critical to preserving crop yields. Several studies have shown that delaying postemergence weed control strategies can substantially reduce crop yield. This has become more of a concern with the large number of glyphosate-resistant crop acres that rely on postemergence applications of glyphosate for weed control. We are not saying that postemergence herbicide application timings are not important in non-glyphosate-resistant crops, but herbicides generally used in these crops are most effective on small weeds. Therefore, growers that are growing non-glyphosate-resistant crops are probably already making postemergence herbicide applications early. If they are not, it is important to also follow the outlined guidelines for postemergence herbicide applications.
In glyphosate-resistant soybeans, there is the temptation to delay postemergence glyphosate applications until all of the weeds have emerged. Delaying these applications can rob soybeans of this maximum yield potential. As mentioned before, research throughout the Midwest and Canada has shown the importance of early season weed control. For example, research conducted in Ontario has shown that delaying herbicide applications more than four weeks after soybean emergence can reduce yield about 0.75 bushel/acre/day.
Over a four-year period, MSU conducted research to study the effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on corn and soybean yield loss from weed competition. This research showed that in at least one of the years that this research was conducted, if weeds were allowed to reach 6-inches in height before control, yield was reduced in narrow row soybeans and 30-inch row corn. Depending on when this yield loss occurred, soybean yield was reduced from 2.5 to 5.5 bushel/acre/day. This starts to add up when you consider the economics. Considering these crop loss estimates, delaying herbicide applications three days would cost you any where from $56.25 to $123.75/acre in soybeans ($7.50 new crop soybean.) Waiting to make postemergence herbicide applications can cost you money. Therefore, it is important to follow the recommendations to avoid yield losses due to early season weed competition.
Weeds should be controlled in:
7.5 and 15-inch row soybean before weeds exceed 4-inches.
30-inch row soybean before weeds exceed 6-inches. |
back to top |
| |
Christy Sprague
Crop & Soil Sciences
Postemergence herbicide applications for weed control in soybeans are quickly approaching. The hot weather has both weeds and soybeans actively growing. With these approaching applications, there are several things that should be considered to maximize weed control with glyphosate in Roundup Ready soybeans. Following these guidelines can help reduce the risk of glyphosate failures, as well as reduce the chances of lower soybean yields due to weed competition.
There are over 30 different glyphosate products that growers in Michigan can choose from for weed control in glyphosate-resistant soybeans. With all of these choices, it is important to keep in mind that not all glyphosate formulations are created equal. Knowing your glyphosate product is essential to achieving optimum weed control. There are two main differences in the many available glyphosate products. Glyphosate products can differ in the concentration of glyphosate acid in the formulation (glyphosate acid is what kills the weed). This concentration is expressed as pounds acid equivalent per gallon (lb a.e./gal). Different glyphosate concentrations will change the amount of product used for the various formulations. Table 10 in the MSU Weed Control Guide for Field Crops (E-434) is a compiled list of several glyphosate products and the product use rates for equivalent amounts of glyphosate acid per acre.
Another difference in glyphosate products is whether a surfactant needs to be added to the spray solution or if the formulated glyphosate product has a built-in adjuvant package. Products like Roundup WeatherMax, Touchdown Total and several others have built-in adjuvant systems. Even though all of these products have a built-in adjuvant system there can and many times are differences in the type of surfactant formulated in the product. These differences may equate to differences in weed control under extreme conditions. However, under most conditions there are no differences between these products especially when they are used at the correct rates, at the appropriate application timings. For products where the addition of a surfactant is recommended, add a high quality non-ionic surfactant at 0.25 to 1.0 percent v/v. Table 10 also includes information on whether the addition of a surfactant is recommended for a particular glyphosate product.
Ammonium sulfate (AMS) should always be added to all glyphosate products. We recommend adding dry spray grade AMS at 17 lbs/100 gal. or the equivalent of 17 lbs/100 gal. of liquid AMS products. The addition of AMS minimizes the negative effect of hard water on glyphosate activity and is important for velvetleaf control, regardless of water quality.
Applying the appropriate glyphosate rate in glyphosate-resistant soybeans is important for consistent weed control. Proper glyphosate rates should be based on weed type, weed size and spray volume. In most cases the appropriate rate to use for weed control in glyphosate-resistant soybean is 0.75 lbs a.e./A of glyphosate. This rate will effectively control several annual weed species between 2 and 8 inches tall. However, if weeds become larger or if harder to control species such as common lambsquarters or giant ragweed are present, increase the glyphosate rate to 1.1 lbs a.e./A or 1.5 lbs a.e./A to adequately control these weed species. In addition, by matching the appropriate glyphosate rate to the correct weed size you reduce your chances of weed control failures under extreme conditions.
Glyphosate application timing is everything! It is important to make timely glyphosate applications to minimize the chances of soybean yield loss due to early-season weed competition and to maximize weed control. As presented in an earlier article of today’s Field CAT Alert the optimum time for glyphosate applications is when weeds are 4 inches tall in narrow-row (7.5 and 15 inches) soybeans and 6 inches tall in wide-row (30 inches) soybeans. Controlling weeds at these times reduces the chances for soybean yield loss, as well as reduces the risk of weed control failures of larger weed that may be under stressful conditions (drought, stem-boring insects, coverage issue, etc.).
Windy conditions in the narrow application windows that we see this time of year make the use of drift reducing nozzles or drift reducing agents almost a necessity to reduce or prevent off-site particle drift. When using these technologies it is important to know their limitations. Using these technologies without the proper spray pressure and spray volumes can lead to reduced weed control with glyphosate. To maintain effectiveness with these technologies, make sure to follow manufacturer’s recommendations on pressure and volume, apply the appropriate glyphosate rate for the target species, and always check for a uniform spray pattern. Combinations of some of these technologies can reduce spray coverage that may result in reduced weed control. Following these guidelines, particularly checking the spray pattern, can help determine if the weeds are receiving an adequate dose of the herbicide for weed control.
Following these guidelines will help maximize glyphosate performance and reduce the risk of soybean yield loss due to weeds in the 2007 season. |
back to top |
| |
Christy Sprague
Crop & Soil Sciences
Standing water or other issues such as herbicide carryover from previous crops can often times lead to bare areas in a sugarbeet field. In these abandoned areas, one question that grower’s often have, “Is what can be replanted in these areas?”, particularly where herbicide applications have been made for weed control in sugarbeets. What can be replanted depends on what herbicides have been applied. Here are some factors to consider for each of the herbicides that are typically used for weed control in sugarbeets.
Nortron (PRE). The Nortron label states, “….do not plant crops other than sugarbeets or ryegrass in treated land in the same season.” This can be a problem if sugarbeets can’t be replanted. In Michigan, a majority of the Nortron that is used for weed control in sugarbeets is applied in a band. Therefore, the soil area between the bands is not treated and planting the replant crop between the bands may reduce the chance for crop injury. The sensitivity of possible replant crops are as follows: small grains > corn > soybean > dry edible beans. Dry edible beans are the most tolerant and are the best choice as a replant crop following a soil application of Nortron.
Pyramin (PRE). Pyramin is another herbicide that is typically applied PRE in a band. The Pyramin label reads, “Do not plant other crops in the treated band.” Again, similar to Nortron, planting the replant crop between the treated bands may reduce the chances of injury to the replant crop.
Betamix or Progress.Betamix has very little residual activity. The only rotational restriction that is listed on the label is not to rotate to cereal grain crops for 120 days. Progress has the same restriction listed on the label. However, with Progress there is a reduced rate of ethofumesate (same active ingredient as Nortron) in this formulation, so keep this in mind when choosing a replant crop.
UpBeet. All crops, other than corn, can be planted 14 days after an UpBeet application. For corn, there is a 21-day recrop restriction.
Stinger. Stinger is the herbicide, that is the most restrictive of the herbicides used in micro-rate applications. The crop rotation interval for applying Stinger and planting soybeans or dry edible beans is 10.5 months. The rotation interval increases to 18 months if soil organic matter is less than 2 percent and there is less than 15 inches of precipitation in the 10 months following the application. Stinger degradation is dependent on several factors: application rate, soil texture, temperature and moisture. The half life of Stinger is 30 to 90 days depending on these factors. Stinger degradation from microbes is greatest in warm-moist soils. Therefore, if 2 fl oz/A of Stinger is applied on May 1, 1 oz/A will be remaining on June 1 if soils are warm and moist. Because of the sensitivity of soybeans and dry beans to Stinger the question of replanting one of these crops in areas of sugar beet fields can be tricky. There is a high risk of bean injury and reduced yields in areas of abandoned sugar beet fields where Stinger was applied. The risk can somewhat be reduced by:
- Planting dry beans in mid- to late- June.
- Low rates of Stinger (1 to 2 fl oz/A) applied April or early May.
- High soil moisture and temperature.
- Low organic matter.
- Tillage to dilute the remaining residues.
However, taking all of these factors into consideration does not guarantee a healthy bean crop. |
back to top |
| |
Christy Sprague
Crop & Soil Sciences
Want to sharpen your diagnostic skills and stay on top of the latest information in production agriculture? If so, we have the perfect opportunity for you. We would like to invite you to attend the fifth annual MSU Crop Diagnostic School. This event is scheduled for Tuesday, July 10 at the MSU Plant Pathology Research Center on the south side of the MSU campus. The school is open to all who are actively involved in production agriculture (growers, agri-business reps, Extension educators and Agency personnel).
Participants will have the opportunity to hone their field decision-making and problem-solving skills as they interact with MSU Extension Specialists in small groups while participating in hands-on field activities.
This year’s Crop Diagnostic School will focus on the topics of: nitrogen management in corn; switchgrass establishment; soybean insect issues; application technologies; and glyphosate-resistant crops.
Approval is pending for RUP credits and continuing education units for certified crop advisors (CCA).
The $125 registration fee is due July 2. Participation is limited to the first 150 paid registrations. More information can be found at www.msuweeds.com or call 517-355-0271, ext. 1112 or e-mail misiak@msu.edu. A brochure with the registration form is enclosed in this issue and can be found at: 6-7DiagnosticSchoolBrochure.pdf |
back to top |
| |
Kurt Thelen
Crop & Soil Sciences
Reports of climate change, global warming and greenhouse gas emissions have been all over the news lately. What does this have to do with agriculture? After many decades of being pointed to as a source of environmental issues, field crop agriculture is being looked to as one of the solutions to global climate change. The basis for this environmental remediation affect is corn’s and other crops’ tremendous potential to remove carbon dioxide (CO2), a major greenhouse gas, from the atmosphere. In fact, Michigan growers can now receive payment for storing carbon in the soil via private sector carbon credit trading managed through the Chicago Climate Exchange.
How much carbon dioxide does an acre of Michigan corn absorb in a growing season? That is a question that is often asked, and the answer may surprise many people. Our calculations show that number to be in excess of 36,000 lbs. of carbon dioxide per acre! Of course, much of that carbon is eventually returned to the atmosphere as the corn crop residue decomposes or the grain is consumed as feed or burned as biofuel, but farmers can maintain a significant amount of carbon in the soil with proper management including implementing reduced or no-till cropping systems. Currently, the Climate Exchange bases Michigan carbon payments on approximately 0.4 to 0.6 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per acre per year depending upon your location and the specific management practices implemented. The price paid per unit of carbon is based annually upon current market prices.
When used as a renewable fuel source such as ethanol, corn also displaces petroleum-based gasoline, a significant contributor of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Each gallon of gasoline burned emits 19.4 lb. of carbon dioxide (5.3 lb of C) to the atmosphere. In fact, the USEPA estimates that the average car in the United States emits approximately 6 tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere annually. Current estimates put U.S. gasoline consumption at about 140 million gallons per year and climbing. The carbon emitted from gasoline is new additional carbon in the atmosphere – carbon that was formerly buried deep under the earth’s surface. Conversely, burning renewable fuels such as corn ethanol has the potential to be carbon neutral since emissions would be essentially recycled carbon.
Finally, in addition to the atmospheric environmental advantage of carbon sequestration, there are land-based environmental/agronomic benefits as well. Increased carbon levels in the soil provide better water infiltration, enhance nutrient cycling, help alleviate compaction and reduce surface run off. To learn more about carbon credit trading, visit the Michigan Conservation and Climate Initiative web page at http://www.michiganclimate.org/ |
back to top |
| |
Phill Wharton & Willie Kirk
Plant Pathology
Seven new high resolution potato diseases extension bulletins are now available for purchase at http://www.emdc.msue.msu.edu/ for $1.50 each. The new group of publications includes the recent potato late blight bulletin and bulletins on early blight, pink rot, Fusarium dry rot, Rhizoctonia diseases, potato common scab, white mold and seed piece management. For more information, call 517-353-6740. You can also download these bulletins from this web page http://www.potatodiseases.org/extensionpubs.html as PDF files from our late blight website.
Also at http://lateblight.org daily updates of potato late blight risk are available for all the Michigan Automated Weather Network sites in Michigan and updates on extension meetings being held throughout the state. |
back to top |
| |
Steven Gower
Diagnostic Services
Last summer, a Montcalm County resident noticed several of his mature trees showing signs of decline. As the summer progressed, so did the injury on his maple, ash, oak, cottonwood and white pine trees. This resident had an ongoing dispute with his neighbor and was convinced this person was killing his trees.
Besides the obvious chlorosis, distortion and browning of the leaves followed by defoliation, there was a spot at the base of each tree that was barren of grass and weeds for several months. I suggested we analyze soil collected near the base of these trees for the presence of residual contaminants capable of causing the observed injury. Unfortunately for the trees, tebuthiuron was detected in the soil at 2.3 ppm. (view photos)
Tebuthiuron (Spike) is a soil-applied herbicide for woody plant control in fencerows, utility right-of-ways, pipelines, pastures, rangelands and other non-cropland areas. Tebuthiuron controls unwanted trees, shrubs and vines after sufficient rainfall has occurred to move the product into the root zone.
In addition to diagnosing plant pathogens, nematodes and insect-related pests, all plant samples submitted to MSU Diagnostic Services – the multi-disciplinary plant health and pest diagnostic facility on campus – are visually inspected for pesticide injury. If warranted, samples can be tested for the presence of pesticide residue using appropriate analytical instruments and techniques.
We urge that clients interested in pesticide residue testing contact the laboratory before collecting and submitting samples. Samples should be collected immediately if pesticide injury is suspected. Collect samples according to visual pesticide expression, as some herbicides affect new plant growth, while others may only affect older growth. Collect enough plant tissue to fill a quart-size plastic bag; collect enough soil to fill a pint-size plastic bag. In general, samples should be frozen immediately and kept frozen until arrival at the laboratory.
Plant samples are visually inspected for pesticide injury for $20. Samples can be tested for pesticide residue on an individual basis or, if available, in multi-pesticide screens. Fees may vary depending upon number of samples, clientele location and numerous other special circumstances. Fees for individual pesticide residue screens are generally $90, $100 and $125 in water, tissue and soil, respectively. Fees for multi-pesticide residue screens are generally $125, $150 and $175 in water, tissue and soil, respectively. Questions regarding pesticide injury or pesticide residue testing should be directed to Steven Gower by phone at 517-432-9693 or by email at sgower@msu.edu. |
back to top |
| |
Ned Birkey
It has been warm, wet and muggy for the past two weekends. A couple of days at or near 90ºF last week is again forecast for today. Some areas received four or more inches of rain, plus high winds over the weekend. A localized and heavy hailstorm hit southwest Lenawee County.
Alfalfa is being cut as farmers “guestimate” the weather and forecasts for rain. Uncut hay quality continues to deteriorate, and high winds over the weekend have blown over some standing hay. Highly managed fields with good re-growth have been sprayed for alfalfa weevil.
Corn is variable in growth depending upon the soil compaction, soils, nitrogen received and rainfall amounts. Many fields had standing water this past week, though plants were above the water and most of the water was gone within 48 hours. Some fields are at V7 and nice and green with even stands, while others are irregular, with shorter and yellow corn. Black cutworms at the 5th and 6th instar have been found in second year corn. European corn borer moths are flying with low numbers found in traps in Wayne, Washtenaw and Lenawee counties this week.
Soybeans are starting off slowly, with bean leaf beetle feeding. Some fields have had too much rain and will have replanted areas. The soybean aphid/ rust sentinel plot in Lenawee County had one aphid last week. The Monroe and Washtenaw plots will be scouted starting in two weeks.
Wheat looks good considering the hot and humid weather. Fields here are past flowering with Septoria, leaf rust, Cephalosporium stripe and powdery mildew diseases present, though no Fusarium head scab is noted yet. Most fields have good yield potential that will rely on favorable weather from now till harvest.
Soil nitrate samples will go to MSU this next Wednesday for later planted corn. |
back to top |
| |
Bruce MacKellar
Rainfall over the weekend was highly variable in the southwest region, with totals ranging from less than an inch to over 2.5 inches in some locations. We have been on a temperature rollercoaster this week with cold night temperatures and pleasant daytime highs following the influx of dry air behind the cold front that passed through the region on the evening of Sunday, June 2. Hot weather returns today with temperatures expected in the 90’s today. Wind conditions are expected to be strong in advance of a strong cold front approaching from the west. There is potential for severe weather this evening and Friday.
Corn has taken advantage of the warmer conditions, which are about a full week ahead of where we were last year, to push growth into the 7-8 leaf collar stage on the earliest planted fields. Some fields have had rescue post emergence sprays applied to clean up weed escapes, mostly grasses. We are applying sidedress nitrogen in most of the earlier planted fields. The one trouble spot seems to be the fields planted to Roundup Ready corn. Weeds have been growing very rapidly, and with the wet and high wind conditions, we have had limited opportunities to get glyphosate on fields. I expect to see some fields exhibiting yield losses where the weeds have grown to heights where competition will occur. We also are beginning to see some crabgrass in the mix on grass escapes. This tends to present us with more of a challenge because there are limited options to control crabgrass in non-Roundup Ready fields.
Seed corn planting is beginning to come to a close. We have had some fields that were delayed as seed was slow in coming in from the off-shore “grow out” areas. Early planted seed corn is looking good at this point. Flaming is being used on the male rows on some fields to extend the period of pollen shed to improve pollination. Many of the same weed escapes that we see in commercial corn is also occurring in seed corn. We are seeing a pickup in the numbers of European corn borer moth flight in the area. We have not seen a large moth flight yet.
Early planted soybeans are developing the second tri-foliate, many later planted fields are now at the unifoliate stage. Bean leaf beetle feeding signs can be found, but remain below threshold on fields that I have scounted. Many of the earlier planted fields have been emerged now for five weeks or more. Some of these fields have been sprayed. Keep an eye on the size of the weeds in soybeans and treat before competition is a problem, or the weeds will get to a size where they are going to be hard to control. Producers should also begin to see cysts on early planted soybean fields that have extremely high levels of SCN in their fields. Watch for uneven patterns of growth. The St. Joseph County SCN Resistant – RR soybean trial featuring 12 varieties was established in late May south of Nottawa. We have found our first soybean aphids in soybeans in southwest Michigan last week. There are very few aphids in fields at this time. You may want to look for ant activity on soybean leaves, a situation that generally will lead you to soybean aphids. The treatment threshold is 250 aphids per plant. Although soybean aphids can rapidly multiply, we expect it will take several weeks for soybean aphids to pose a threat to the crop.
Alfalfa harvest has been significantly slowed by persistent rain in the forecast over the last couple of weeks. Be sure to watch for alfalfa weevils in the early re-growth. Also, potato leafhoppers are back into Michigan. Watch your alfalfa re-growth carefully for this pest, because the early re-growth period is the most vulnerable to “hopper burn” injury. Winter injury and alfalfa weevil damage have reduced first cutting yields by 20 percent or more in some fields this spring.
Wheat continues to look to have good yield potential in the region. While we did have rainy conditions during a portion of the flowering window, at least a portion of the time was dry. We will be looking during the next couple of weeks for the development of bleached heads, denoting infection from Fusarium head blight. We also need to keep an eye out for armyworms, especially along the border areas because some fields in Indiana and Ohio have reported problems from this pest.
The St. Joseph County IPM Breakfast Meetings are being held on June 13, June 20, and July 5 and July 12 this year at the St. Joseph County MSU Extension office, 7:00 AM-9:00 AM. Cost is $7, which includes a catered in breakfast. Our guest speaker next week will be Dr. Greg Shaner, Purdue University field crops pathologist. Dr. Shaner will be talking about control of corn leaf diseases in commercial and seed corn. |
back to top |
| |
Fred SpringbornA gentle rain fell for most of the day Sunday June 2 leaving 1.0 to 1.5 inches of rain across much of Montcalm County. Other areas of the region received as little as 0.5 inch, but in some cases up to 2.5 inches of rain. High temperatures in the last week have ranged from the mid 60’s to the lower 80’s.
Wheat is well into flowering in most fields. Much of the crop was flowering over the weekend. Powdery mildew is advancing up the plant in fields of susceptible varieties as well as some irrigated fields of moderately susceptible varieties.
Oats are progressing well with few insect disease problems at this time.
The 2006 corn harvest is now complete as of the June 5. Every year there seems to always be that last field standing. This is earlier than most years. In the 2007 crop, corn growth ranges from V1 to V8 with the majority in the range of V4 to V6. Some fields have emerged unevenly due to soil moisture variability. European corn borer trap catches are picking up with an average of 19 moths per trap at out Stanton trap site.
Soybean planting is progressing with 95 percent or more of the crop in the ground with several fields emerged with growth up to V2.
Dry bean planting has begun with 10 percent of the crop planted and fewer acres anticipated this year. With dryer weather in the coming week, we anticipate rapid progress in planting.
Alfalfa harvest is underway with nearly 50 percent of the crop harvested. Alfalfa weevil is still active in some fields. Harvested fields need to be monitored for feeding on re-growth. Potato leafhopper is around and scouting for this pest should begin.
Volunteer potatoes continue to be an issue. |
back to top |
| |
Paul Gross The most often used phrase for last week’s rains is “a million dollar rain.” The amount varied from 1.5 to 3.0 inches across the region. With most crops being planted and some needing this rain to emerge, this rain came at just the right time. While the rain was timely for growing crops, hay harvest has slowed and farmers trying to bale hay are not getting any drying days.
The corn crop is doing very well with this week’s rain. We have corn that is knee high and most of the stands are very good. Nitrogen applications are being made as well as herbicide applications. We are seeing very few problems at this time.
Soybeans are nearly all planted with just a few fields left that will be planted this week. Most stands will be adequate for optimum yields. The rains this week is just what was needed to help emergence on the fields that were planted in less that desirable conditions.
Field activities include herbicide applications.
Wheat has nearly completed flowering. The crop generally looks good. We are seeing powdery mildew and septoria. Fungicide applications were made last week to protect the crop from head scab. The timing was about right with the rains this week. There have been reports of a few armyworm found. Fields should be scouted for army worm.
Alfalfa harvest has been slowed by this week’s rain. Harvest is about 50 percent complete with most farmers calling yields average to below average. Alfalfa weevil numbers are over threshold in fields that have not been harvested. Potato leafhoppers have been found in some of the re-growth.
Oats are doing very well, and the stands are excellent. Alfalfa seedings in these fields are growing well. Herbicide applications are being made.
Dry bean planting is just getting started. We expect planting to go full speed ahead when field conditions allow.
Sugar beet fields are doing quite well and stands are generally good. The crop is enjoying the rains and favorable weather. |
back to top |
| |
Mark SeamonWide swings of temperatures between the 40’s and the 80’s have been seen in the past week. Rainfall of about one inch fell in most of the area on Monday. This was followed by a full day of cool temperatures, which slowed drying.
In alfalfa, some hay has been harvested as conditions allowed, but much is waiting for a few days of good weather to cut.
Sugar beets are growing quickly. Many fields look very good with others struggling to add growth.
The wheat crop is variable with some fields well beyond flowering and others just now flowering. Fungicide applications to protect against Fusarium head blight are still possible in delayed fields, but most are beyond a labeled application. The rainfall and slow drying of this past week have encouraged Fusarium infection.
Corn growth is active with the tallest corn about 18 inches tall. Weed control and sidedress nitrogen applications are being made in most areas. Remember that yield can be affected with weeds over 4 inches in height. Early planted corn that has not been sidedressed yet is starting to show some yellowing.
In soybeans, most fields have emerged nicely with the most advanced fields having one trifoliate. Stands look good. Soybean aphids have arrived with low populations. Slugs have been found reducing stands in the southern Thumb.
In dry beans, planting has slowed due to rainfall, but soil moisture conditions should be very good when planting resumes. |
back to top |
| |
Jeff Andresen
Agricultural Meteorology
Geography
An area of low pressure located in the northern Great Plains will rapidly intensify and move to central Ontario by late Friday, June 8. A warm front associated with this system will move from southwest to northeast across Michigan Thursday, followed by the passage of a strong cold front overnight Thursday into the day Friday. A line of showers and thunderstorms will develop out ahead of the cold front by late Thursday evening. Due to strong winds at and above ground level as well the dynamics associated with this system, some storms will likely become severe during the overnight hours Thursday into Friday morning, especially across northern and western sections of the state. The primary severe weather threats will be high winds and large hail. In western and central sections of Upper Michigan, tornadoes are also a possibility. The storms are expected to exit eastern sections of the Lower Peninsula by mid afternoon Friday. Areal coverage of the precipitation is expected to remain scattered, with 0.25-0.50 inch totals where rain falls. Temperatures Thursday ahead of the cold front will surge into the 80's to near 90EF and fall only into 60's and 70's Thursday night accompanied by strong, gusty southerly winds from 15-25 mph.
Following the passage of the front, high pressure is expected to move in for the weekend, leading to fair, dry and seasonably warm conditions Saturday and Sunday and likely into early next week as well. Temperatures will fall back to near or slightly below normal levels early in the weekend, warming to near normal levels by Monday of next week. Highs by Sunday will generally range from the low 70's north to the low 80's north with lows in the 50's to low 60's. Rainfall will be possible once again by the middle of next week.
Further ahead, medium range forecast guidance is consistent in calling for the formation of an upper air troughing feature across western sections of the United States with a ridge across the east. This would leave Michigan under southwesterly flow aloft with an active storm track across the Midwest. The official NOAA 6‑10 day and 8-14 day outlooks for June 12-16 and June 14-20 call for above normal mean temperatures statewide. Precipitation during the 6-10 day period is forecast to range from near normal levels in Lower Michigan to above normal levels in the Upper Peninsula. During the 8-14 day period, precipitation is forecast to fall back to below normal levels statewide. |
 |
| Back to top |
|