 |
 |
|
|
 |
Fall treatment of
peach leaf curl
Mark Longstroth
District Extension Horticultural & Marketing Agent
|
Peach leaf curl has become an important disease
in Michigan. This disease of peaches and nectarines can defoliate
trees. Infections take place in the spring as the buds open. The
fungus infects peach buds from bud swell to bud opening under wet
conditions. Infected leaves will eventually fall off. Peach leaf
curl weakens the tree by removing leaves during early growth. Peach
leaf curl seems to become epidemic in Southwest Michigan following
years when frost reduces the crop and growers save money by reducing
sprays. Either spring or fall sprays can be used to control the
disease by killing overwintering spores before they infect the buds.
A combination of spring and fall sprays has been effective in other
areas in controlling the disease.
Growers with a reduced peach spray schedule this
year should plan on controlling the disease. Fall applications should
be made after most of the leaves have fallen, when the buds have
been exposed and can be easily sprayed. Good coverage is essential.
Avoid sprays when frosts are likely for the next two days. Effective
controls include Bravo, Ziram, Ferbam (Carbamate) and copper compounds.
|
|
 |
Fall is a good time to scout for
problems in fruit plantings
Mark Longstroth
District Extension Horticultural & Marketing Agent
|
Fall is a busy time for apple and grape growers.
Most are busy harvesting their crops. Fall is a good time for all
fruit growers to assess their plants and note any problems so they
can plan a course of action for the upcoming year. Carry a small
notebook with you to write down problems you see. You can review
them later after the harvest crush has passed. Are there areas where
your weed control has failed? Do you see differences in the ground
or soil that would indicate that a different rate or material would
be effective? Tree fruit growers should be on the alert for trees
that change color early. This is an indication of a root problem.
It could be either collar rot (phytophthora) or fire blight. If
there is no indication of fire blight in the orchard or oozing at
the graft union then the cause is probably phytophthora and an application
of Ridomil may save the tree.
If fire blight is present in the orchard, then use
this time to determine how aggressively to prune in the winter.
Some growers I know go through blighted orchards three times looking
for old cankers that can inoculate the orchard in the spring. Are
there trees that have never recovered from a fire blight episode
and seem to have fire blight every year? In these trees the bacteria
has become systemic. You are better off to remove that tree than
to waste time trying to control the disease every year. In older
blocks that suffered a huge amount of fire blight so that most of
the bearing surface was killed and there is lots of new growth it
may be better to do nothing for a year and then prune out all the
dead wood in the second year. This prevents a heavy flush of succulent
growth next spring that is susceptible to fire blight. This is not
a strategy I would recommend for fire blight susceptible trees on
dwarfing rootstocks -- only for moderately susceptible older trees
that are unlikely to be killed outright by the disease. For light,
scattered or moderate infections I would recommend pruning out the
dead wood. A can of spray paint is good for marking isolated strikes
to prune out later.
Also, during harvest pay attention to areas in the
field where insect problems are apparent. These are the hotspots
that you should monitor next year to maintain good insect control.
This is where you or your scout should be monitoring to determine
when and where to spray. Insect traps should be placed where the
insects are -- not where it is convenient to check the traps. Keeping
track of the problems that you see this fall will put you a step
ahead in controlling problems next spring.
|
|
 |
Grape berry moth rears its ugly
head
Rufus Isaacs
Entomology
|
Vineyard sampling in recent weeks has revealed a
continued period of egglaying by grape berry moth. This has translated
into larvae being present at high densities in some juice vineyards
in Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania just as the harvesters move
in. Unfortunately, we are too close to harvest for control of these
infestations, and the battle has been won or lost by this point
in the season. However, actions can be taken to minimize the risk
of larvae being harvested with the grapes.
It is worth inspecting vineyards before harvest
to determine whether berry moth is worse at the border, in the interior,
or if it is throughout the vineyard. Looking for dropped berries
under the trellis is an easy way to detect infestations, and in
some Southwest Michigan vineyards inspected yesterday, not harvesting
the first few post lengths near to the woods would have greatly
reduced the likelihood of load contamination. In addition, cluster
weights were much lower in these heavily infested areas, so leaving
these will have a small effect on the tonnage harvested.
This year will go down as one of the worst in memory
for berry moth infestations, and there will be plenty of discussions
this winter about how to combat this next year. With the expected
populations of berry moth overwintering in the leaf litter this
winter, unless there is a hard freeze before snowfall, we can expect
high pressure from this pest in spring 2003. Making a plan for monitoring
pests and planning effective control strategies this winter will
pay dividends in keeping ahead of this pest next year.
As part of our studies on berry moth, we would like
to collect berry moth larvae for testing this fall. If grape growers
who experienced high berry moth infestations would like to be included
in this survey, please contact the Small Fruit Entomology Lab at
(517) 432-9554.
|
|
 |
Asian ladybeetles are less of a
headache in 2002
Rufus Isaacs
Entomology
|
At this time last year, I was receiving the first
reports from grape and raspberry growers of ladybeetles feeding
on fruit and causing problems at harvest. This year is quite different,
with much lower populations of this insect across the region. Conditions
were not as favorable for ladybeetle development this year, and
the fall migration to houses is expected to be much lower. Reports
from fruit growers and processors indicate that ladybeetles will
be one less headache for this year.
In response to the problems for fruit growers caused
by ladybeetles in 2001, a team of MSU Extension entomologists produced
fact cards and a website on the biology and management of this insect
in homes and fruit crops. The website is available at: http://www.ipm.msu.edu/asianladybeetle.htm
and packs of 100 fact cards can be ordered free from MSU Integrated
Pest Management Program (see Multi-colored
Asian lady beetle in fruit crops). Text from the webpage
related to this beetle's biology and management in fruit crops is
reprinted in this issue.
|
|
 |
Multi-colored Asian lady beetle
in fruit crops
Rufus Isaacs
Entomology
|
Background
The multi-colored Asian lady beetle is a beneficial
insect that has become established throughout the eastern United
States. Originally introduced to help manage tree fruit pests, it
has become a nuisance for homeowners and for some agricultural crops.
In recent years, it has caused problems for growers of fall-ripening
fruit, who find the beetles on and in their fruit during harvest.
However, this insect also helps fruit growers during the summer
months when adults and larvae provide biological control of many
soft-bodied insects, including aphids and leafhoppers. During the
fall when the adult lady beetles begin to search for energy and
sheltered sites for overwintering, fruit crops can provide both
of these resources and large numbers of beetles can infest fall-ripening
fruit. Raspberry, blackberry, grape, and peach are particularly
affected.
Identification
As their name suggests, adult Asian lady beetles
can take on many different color forms, varying from yellow to orange
and red. Their spots may be dark on the wing covers or they may
be faded or absent. Even the number and size of the spots varies.
Many beetles have a straw-colored pronotum (top covering of middle
body part) with markings that fuse into a regular- to irregularly-shaped
"M" if viewed from the front, or "W" if viewed
from behind. (Pictured at left to show an "M")
The adult beetles are approximately a quarter-inch
long, with a domed, round to oval shape. They are similar to many
of the native species of lady beetles that do not cause homeowners
or fruit growers problems. Native lady beetle species typically
overwinter in sheltered sites outdoors and do not seek homes during
the fall.
Immatures (larvae) are covered
with tiny, flexible spines that do not sting. (See photo at right
of larva eating aphids.) Their body is alligator-shaped and they
can rapidly move over leaves and branches, where they eat aphids
and other soft-bodied insects. Eggs are yellow, oval-shaped, and
occur in clusters of about 20, usually on the undersides of leaves.
Biology
The multi-colored Asian lady beetle is similar to
native lady beetles in many ways. It also feeds on soft-bodied insects
such as aphids and leafhoppers. However, some of its habits are
different from those of native species. To find out more, including
how to distinguish the introduced species from our native lady beetles,
visit our web page about biology.
Damage
Fruit growers and MSU Extension agents first reported
direct feeding damage by adult Asian lady beetles in Michigan during
fall 2001. The greatest number of reports was from fall raspberries
and on over-ripe grapes in the southern half of the Lower Peninsula,
though the beetle is present through much of Michigan. It is still
unclear whether the beetles are starting this damage or whether
they are exploiting berries that have already been split for other
reasons. Either way, their presence is most unwelcome at harvest.
A more serious issue for growers selling fresh berries
is the potential for contamination with adult Asian lady beetles.
If berries are picked with beetles and then placed in cold storage,
the beetles seem to move away from the cold, and this typically
means that they burrow deeper into the berry. Once out on the fruit
stand, beetles may warm up and fly out of the container, but they
could also be bought and eaten.
When disturbed, the adults release a noxious yellow-orange
liquid from their legs. This is called reflex bleeding and is meant
to prevent birds and other predators from eating the beetle. The
defense secretion is extremely bitter and unpleasant tasting with
a strong odor. Preventing beetles from being harvested is important
to avoid contamination that can lead to customer complaints and
off-flavors in juice or wine. Learning more about the biology of
the Asian lady beetle can help in understanding how to prevent their
infestation into a fruit planting, and this is briefly reviewed
below.
Management
Growers that find their fruit infested with a few
adult beetles immediately before picking can instruct hand pickers
to carefully avoid them. This may not be economically feasible on
a large planting, however, and growers may have to resort to other
tactics. Camphor and menthol have recently been shown to repel adult
beetles, but their activity lasted for only a short time and no
commercial formulations are yet available.
Ladybeetles are efficient predators of pest insects
for the majority of the growing season, and most chemical controls
for this introduced beetle will also kill native predators. If beetles
reach pest levels in a fruit planting before harvest, insecticides
applied for other near-harvest pests may allow growers to achieve
insect-free fruit during harvest. Pesticides applied for control
of other beetle pests such as Japanese beetle are likely to control
Asian lady beetle infestations. The waiting period restrictions
will vary by crop, so the labels should be checked carefully before
any product is used near to harvest, to allow pickers to re-enter
and harvest to proceed.
Pesticides should be applied only to infested areas
to minimize chemical exposure and to avoid causing outbreaks of
other plant-infesting pests because these products also kill beneficial
insects. Many pesticides are labeled for use only by certified,
licensed applicators that have received specialized training on
the use and disposal of pesticides. These pesticides should not
be applied by unlicensed homeowners, and at all times, their use
should be in accordance with the label.
Information cards about Asian lady
beetle for distribution to U-Pick customers and others
We have created information cards with color photos
and a brief summary of the information offered at this web site.
The cards fold in half to be "business card" size (3.5"
X 2.25") and encourage people to visit this web site for updated
additional information. Michigan fruit growers can call the MSU
IPM Program (517-432-2203) or email pattersj@msue.msu.edu
to request packets of 100 cards while supplies last. The cards can
be distributed to farm market or U-Pick customers who have questions
about the beetles. Click here
to see a pdf file of the card. Similar information is available
in this pdf file of an article that may be copied in newsletters
(click here).
|
|
 |
Guthion update for fruit growers
Rufus Isaacs, Entomology
Jim Nugent, Northwest Hort. Research Station
|
There have been plenty of questions about the future
of Guthion in fruit crops. The list below comes from recent correspondence
with Bayer CropScience personnel, and it should clarify the current
situation particularly with respect to use of product currently
in growers possession or in the channels of trade.
Details of the EPA memorandum of agreement that
affect Michigan fruit crops include:
Time-limited registration (will be cancelled 12-31-05
unless submitted data indicate registration should be continued):
apples, blueberries, cherries, and pears.
Phased-out (will be canceled as of 8-31-05 and cannot
be used after 12-31-05): cranberries, nectarines, peaches, and caneberries.
Cancelled (no more sales from 9-1-02 but existing
stocks can be used): grapes, plums, quince, and strawberries.
There will be no more Guthion produced by Bayer
CropScience for use on crops where the use has been cancelled (grapes,
plums, strawberries). However, existing stocks labeled for
these uses can continue to be sold in the channels of trade and
all tolerances will be maintained.
|
|
 |
Blueberry production in West Central
Michigan: A preliminary diagnostic, field season 2002
Carlos Garcia-Salazar
Ottawa County
|
The immediate goal of the program was to conduct
a diagnostic overview to determine the challenges and opportunities
for the small fruit industry of West Central Michigan. Since more
than 90 percent of the small fruit industry in this region corresponds
to blueberry production, special priority has been given to this
crop. A preliminary analysis of the conditions of the West central
Michigan blueberry industry identified two major factors seriously
affecting blueberry production and productivity. One factor is the
recurring late spring frosts. The second factor is road salt damage
to blueberry fields alongside the major roads in West Central Michigan.
Spring frost damage to blueberry
fields across West Central Michigan
The consensus among growers and technical personnel
is that spring frost damage and the short growing season are the
main climatic factors limiting blueberry productivity in West Central
Michigan. For example between 1995 and 2000 the average yield fluctuated
between 2,725 and 4,250 pound per acre (six year average, 3,710
pounds/acre) well below the one observed in other blueberry growing
regions (New Jersey and the West coast).
We quantified the spring frost effect on blueberry
production from March to May 2002 in 23 blueberry fields located
in Ottawa County. The evaluation was conducted in frost-protected
fields during the blueberry pre-bloom and bloom period in the varieties
Bluecrop, Blueray and Duke. This evaluation was complemented with
a questionnaire mailed to 180 blueberry growers in West Central
Michigan.
Preliminary results indicated that there were six
frost events during the time period comprised between the early
bloom (4/23, 4/26 and 5/4) and late bloom (5/17, 5/19, and 5/21).
Previous to April 22, at 0.25 inches green stage winter damage to
buds varied from 2 to 25 percent. At the time of the first frost
events the varieties Bluecrop, Blueray and Duke were in early pink.
A frost damage evaluation conducted after April 27 showed that 2
to 5 percent of all blossoms were damaged. A second evaluation conducted
on May 15, after two more frost events showed only a slight increase
in the accumulated frost damage averaging 2.7 percent. However,
frost damage in Bluecrop unprotected blueberries adjacent to the
protected areas was 36.7 percent, approximately. At the end of May,
frost damage in early varieties ranged from 10 to 50 percent. However,
the distribution of damage was scattered or concentrated along the
edges of the field or in areas where the cold air remained trapped
for longer time.
The grower's frost control decision-making process
played an important role in the extent of the frost damage. Basically,
the grower's decision to turn on the overhead irrigation and the
temperature at which the irrigation was turned on were critical
to prevent serious frost damage. The response from 47 growers that
answered the questionnaire showed that, on April 22, 26 and May
5, only 35.7, 37.2, and 59.6 percent of the growers with overhead
irrigation used the irrigation system for frost protection.
Frost control timing was another problem. Under
conditions of low relative humidity (rH), less than 50 percent,
the recommended temperature at which sprinkling irrigation should
be started is around 37°F. However, if the rH is above 50 percent,
the sprinkling may be started at 34°F. The results of the enquire
showed that 38 percent of the growers that used the sprinkle irrigation
for frost protection during the first frost event turned on the
irrigation system when the temperature was above 34°F, the remaining
did it when the temperature dropped below 32°F. During the third
frost event, 26 percent turned the irrigation system on when the
temperature was around 34°F and 74 percent did so when the temperature
was around 32-33°F. Those that waited until the temperature was
close to the freezing point to turn on the irrigation system suffered
frost damage. As a result of this, early varieties like Bluecrop,
Blueray, and Duke that were in the early pink growth stage at that
time suffered 10 to 20 percent frost damage. However, in late season
varieties such as Jersey, the damage was minimal.
These preliminary results seem to confirm that late
spring frosts are responsible in a part for the yearly fluctuation
in blueberry yield. According to the Michigan Fruit Inventory 2000-2001,
a 26.6 percent of the blueberry production area corresponds to the
variety Bluecrop, the most affected variety by spring frosts. Early
estimates for the size of the 2002 Michigan's blueberry crop published
by the North America Blueberry Council indicate a 17 percent decrease
in blueberry production in relation to the 2001 blueberry crop.
Since most of the frost damage was confined to early varieties,
mainly Bluecrop, this percentage nearly matches the frost damage
we recorded in our field survey.
Road salt damage to blueberry fields
alongside the major highways in WC Michigan
Urban sprawl in West Central Michigan has created
a conflict between agricultural communities and urban dwellers that
impose environmental changes amenable to urban life but very often
detrimental for communities that depend on agricultural production.
That is the case of the use of salt during the winter to de-ice
the major highways across West Central Michigan. As the highway
traffic increases in this region, the need to maintain the roads
free of ice and snow has also increased and with this the use of
road salt. Salt particles blown onto blueberry fields adjacent to
major highways seemed to adversely affect the health of blueberry
bushes up to 300 ft away from the highway. Affected blueberry bushes
looked stunted in growth and show symptoms of dieback with bud development
limited to the protected side of the bush. It took several years
to realize that this damage was caused by road salt. In 2001, the
MSU Horticulture Department, MSU Extension and Ottawa County initiated
a study to document the extent of the damage to blueberry field
proximate to major highways and secondary roads in Ottawa County.
A field evaluation conducted from March to May 2002 in 19 blueberry
fields indicated that, previous to the first spring frost event
(April 22) in the region, bud winter damage in secondary roads was
9.3 percent in front of the road (» 100 ft away) and 7.9 in the
back of the field, approximately 300 ft away from the road (Figure
1). In fields located alongside M-45 and US31 bud damage
was 33.1 and 63.1 percent in front of the road and 19.6 and 31.3
percent in the back of the fields, respectively (Figure
2). After the frost events that occurred in April 22-23,
25-26 and May 5-6, bud kill increased dramatically in fields alongside
US31 and in some instances 90 percent of the buds were killed.
Our preliminary results indicated that road salt
decreases the winter hardiness of the blueberry plants and increases
its susceptibility to low temperatures, especially during the bud
break period. In addition, this research provided consistent evidences
of the deleterious effect of the de-icing salt on blueberry fields
in proximity to urban developments and highways across West Central
Michigan.
Figure 1. Damage in secondary road. 144th
Street; left side, 100 ft away from the road. Right side; back of
the field, 300 ft away from the road.
Figure 2. Damage in main highway. US 31; left side,
damage 100 ft ways from the road. Right side; back of the field,
300 ft away from the road.
|
|
 |
2002 in review
Editor's note: Agents from around
the state have prepared this summary of the 2002 season.
|
Southwest
Weather: March
was cool. April began with cool weather, but a week of summer-like
weather caused rapid plant growth. A classic radiation frost with
clear skies and calm conditions on April 22, 2002, caused significant
losses to all fruit crops. The warmest temperature reported was
28°F and lows from 13 to
18 were reported in blueberries. The following four weeks were wet
and cold and slowed plant development. This cool wet period ended
with blast of cold air and almost a week of frosts from May 17 to
May 21. These frosts were important to strawberry and blueberry
growers, but tree fruit growers suffered most of their losses from
the first frosts in April.
June and July were hot and dry, quickly drying out
the soil leading to drought conditions and reduced plant and fruit
growth. August was hot but had rain in most areas and allowed crops
to develop. September brought a return to dry weather until the
first day of fall brought cool weather and rain during apple and
grape harvest.
Diseases: Bacterial
diseases were common in stone fruit due to the cool, wet spring.
Fire blight was a minor problem. Fungal diseases were common in
fruit plantings abandoned due to poor crop. There were lots of frost
marks and russeting on the surviving fruit.
Insects: Insect
activity seemed normal but direct pests such as codling moth, Oriental
fruit moth and grape berry moth were major problems for fruit growers.
Apricots were killed in the shuck by the April 22 freeze.
Peaches were still in bloom on April 22.
In Berrien County, the frost reduced the crop, but most growers
still had a fair crop on good high peach sites. Lower sites and
sites away from the lake suffered a total loss. Bacterial spot symptoms
are common on susceptible varieties due to the cool, wet spring.
Peach leaf curl was not a major problem this year. Split pits were
a problem. This may have been due to the light crop loads. Oriental
fruit moth was a steady problem during harvest. Because of the dry
summer, brown rot was not a problem.
In cherries, crop losses due to freezing
temperatures were significant. Due to the small size of the fruit,
total fruit number needs to be large to have a full crop. Sweet
cherries were in bloom and only the best sites had a good crop.
For both Tart cherries and sweet cherries frost damage
was minor, but the cool, wet weather during bloom resulted in poor
pollination and a poor crop. The Southwest Michigan cherry crop
was about 25 to 30 percent of a full crop. The cool, wet weather
also resulted in widespread bacterial spot problem early in the
year. Cherry leaf spot was not a problem in sprayed orchards with
a crop, but orchards that were not sprayed because of a light crop
were defoliated by harvest. Birds and raccoons ate a large portion
of the crop before harvest.
Plums had a very light crop due to frost
and a heavy drop. Japanese plums were past full bloom and
most flowers were killed by the frost. European plums were
at full bloom, but frost damage did not look severe at first, but
almost all of the fruit fell off the trees during June drop. Very
few growers harvested plums in 2002.
Apples were at tight cluster during the low
temperature episode and lost the king bloom and some of the side
bloom. Poor pollination conditions and another series of frosts
resulted in a heavy drop and a very light crop. The total apple
crop was probably only 30 percent of a full crop for the region.
Apple scab was the main disease problem in the Southwest and many
orchards were nearly defoliated in June by the wet spring. Some
growers did not spray blocks with heavy frost damage. Fire blight
was not a major problem in the Southwest this year, but damage was
heavy in some Central Berrien County orchards. Codling moth and
Oriental fruit moth were major insects pests with heavy sustained
flights throughout the year. Reports of wormy fruit were received
in July indicating that the first generation of codling moth was
especially long in 2002. European red mites were also a common problem
in July.
Pears suffered damage due to frosts and poor
pollination similar to apples. Codling moth damage from late first
generation larvae was a common complaint.
Blueberries in Berrien and Van Buren counties
suffered scatter damage from the April frost. Some sites did suffer
severe damage and a common problem was fewer leaves on a bush than
fruit. The frosts from May 17 to May 21 occurred during bloom and
caused damage as well. Hot, dry conditions during most of the harvest
season kept the fruit size of later pickings small. Japanese beetle,
an emerging pest problem in blueberries, was better controlled this
year as growers become more adept at controlling this new pest.
Growers who sprayed at the first sign of Japanese beetle had better
control than those who waited for the beetle numbers to build up.
Birds were a major problem during harvest.
Grapes suffered greatly from the April 22
frost. Only the highest sites escaped damage. In lower vineyards
almost all the buds froze. Secondary and tertiary buds began to
grow in late May with the return of warm weather, but for a month,
the vineyards looked as if they were dead. Wine grapes suffered
less because they began growth later and are usually in better higher
sites. Most growers adopted a reduced spray program until bloom
revealed that many new shoots had flower clusters. Cool, wet conditions
during early shoot growth favored phomopsis, the major disease problem
in 2002. Black rot, powdery and downy mildew were not significant.
Grape berry
moth pressure was heavy throughout the season and a heavy flight
in September caused widespread damage. Japanese beetle was the other
major insect pest. The final crop appears to be about 30 percent
of a normal crop.
Strawberry flower buds were emerging from
the crow on April 22 and the early frost caused little damage. Fields
that wintered under plastic were beginning to bloom and suffered
losses. Many fields were damaged during bloom by the May frosts.
Strawberry growers had to frost protect with sprinklers. These frosts
and the poor pollination weather caused a lot of misshapen fruit.
Cranberries generally escaped frost damage.
Managed fields seem to have a good crop.
Miscellaneous: Birds
and raccoons were major problems eating fruit before harvest.
Southeast
As I have been preparing
this season summary over the last week, I've tried to think of adjectives
that could describe our 2002 growing season. Some that come to mind
include unusual, strange, weird, unforgivable, etc. I guess the
best words I can share with you regarding the season is one of extremes.
Recall that our spring started out to be early and
warm. Both tree fruits and small fruits got off to an early growing
season. Many growers were able to plant in late March or early April
this year with no considerations for wet soils. Along about mid-
to late May things took a dramatic turn in that we had several frost
and freeze events, which affected all of our fruit crops in Southeast
Michigan. We had two major freeze events that took flower buds and
blossoms at critical times. These freeze events were April 27 and
May 19. Besides these two major events, we had an extreme number
of frosty mornings. Many strawberry growers reported frost protecting
between 10 and 15 times this year. Furthermore, many growers reported
frost protecting 5 to 7 consecutive mornings, which has been virtually
unheard of in the past. Because of this cool down in our weather,
our season dropped back to one that was behind the norm. We also
had a lot of moisture during this time.
Beginning in early June we started a trend of extreme
heat and lack of moisture, which seemed to plague most fruit growers
for the rest of the season. Our soil conditions went from moderate
soil moisture levels, to below adequate, to extremely dry in a matter
of three weeks or so. The heat in mid-June caused our late strawberry
season to be shortened to a week to ten days at most farms. It was
a bit ironic that many strawberry growers frost protected more times
than the days that they were able to harvest fruit. For the rest
of the summer season, most of our fruit crops began harvest earlier
and earlier. Sweet and tart cherries were harvested about 5 days
ahead of normal and fall red raspberries about 10 days ahead of
normal at many farms. Blueberry harvest began about 10 days ahead
of the typical year and apple harvest has been accelerated as well
as a result of the extreme heat and dry soils.
More specifically our apple crop was hurt
significantly by the May 19 frost and freeze event. Many farms reported
complete bud loss for many of the early varieties of apples. For
the most part our apple crop was the fruit crop most significantly
affected by these cold weather conditions in springtime. While we
did have some farms in Lenawee and Monroe counties that reported
80 to 90 percent of normal crop, most farms are now picking out
at about 30 to 50 percent of a normal crop. It also seems that we've
had heavy pressure from codling moth this year and as a result seen
significantly higher levels of fruit damage than is typical. Dry
soil conditions have reduced fruit size as well. Lastly, the strange
weather conditions back in spring resulted in a long extended bloom
period (three weeks at many farms) that has resulted in apple maturity
that is similarly spread out over an extended time period. So the
bottom line for apple growers has been that we have a small crop
that was hit hard by frost and freeze and that the maturity is somewhat
in question.
Peaches were also affected by the frost and
freeze events this spring. We had an excellent crop of flower buds
make it through the winter and most farms were in full bloom during
one of the two frosts and freeze events. With the exception of the
Romeo area, which had a full crop of peaches, most other peach growers
had a total loss of the peach crop. There also was a significant
amount of pressure this year from Oriental fruit moth in peaches
in the Romeo area.
Sweet and tart cherries did make it
through the frost and freeze events, however the crop size was diminished
to about 60 to 70 percent of normal. It was amazing to see how much
thinning and fruit drop occurred through the month of June in both
sweet and sour cherries. Dry soil conditions also resulted in fruit
that was smaller than normal in size.
Strawberry yields were about 50 to 70 percent
of normal due to freeze that affected the flower bud while it was
still in the crown of the plant. Due to dry soil conditions, many
patches did not rebound well after renovation.
Northwest
|
Comparative Growing Degree Days Through 9/23
NWMI Horticultural Research Station
|
| |
2002
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
1998
|
1997
|
GDD42
|
3592
|
3662
|
3452
|
3734
|
3874
|
3093
|
|
GDD45
|
3143
|
3177
|
2945
|
3232
|
3366
|
2644
|
|
GDD50
|
2453
|
2416
|
2161
|
2454
|
2568
|
1950
|
Weather: The
season began with a few days of record heat in mid-April, followed
by two months of very cold, wet weather. Included is a comparison
of growing degree days for the past six years. In mid-June it abruptly
changed to above normal temperatures and not much precipitation.
The drought was not as bad as the severe drought of 2001, but still
the summer was hot and fairly dry. As in 2001, July was the dry
month, with only 1.06 inches of rain at the NWMHRS, compared to
the previous 20-year average during July of 2.72 inches. Evaporation
was below the 20-year average in May and June, then well above normal
in July and August. In fact, during the past 21 years, evaporation
during July of 2002 was exceeded only in 1983, and August evaporation
was exceeded only in 1991. No year exceeds the combination of July
and August 2002. It is no wonder that some orchards have shown signs
from drought when one combines the high evaporation during the heat
of summer with the low rainfall during that period.
But what 2002 will long be remembered for is not
the summer heat or moisture, but a killer wind (convection) freeze
on April 21 and 22. This was followed by a hard inversion freeze
on May 19 and dismal pollination conditions during May when daytime
highs rarely reached 60ºF. This combination of conditions led to
the most devastating cherry crop in history and most other crops
in short supply as well.
Tart cherries were by far the smallest
crop in Northwest Michigan since records were kept, and likely the
smallest since tarts began to be planted in the late 19th
century. One million pounds were harvested in an area that has averaged
145 million pounds during the past five years. Cherry leaf spot
pressure was high this season. For many growers, the money they
saved by not needing to apply insecticides was offset by increased
fungicide costs.
The sweet cherry crop was also very, very
small, with Golds producing more than other varieties - overall,
maybe 15 percent of a sweet crop. Fruit quality was great. Interestingly,
data from the NWMHRS showed that not only did varieties vary greatly
in their flower bud survival as one would expect but also rootstock
influenced flower bud survival with several test varieties. Gisela
rootstocks imparted the best flower bud survival to the scion variety;
Mazzard was the worst, with Mahaleb giving intermediate results.
The influence of rootstock was very significant in some cases. Bacterial
canker infection of spurs and shoots in sweets is the worst in at
least 27 years. The infection resulted from the extended cool, wet
spring weather combined with the May inversion freeze events.
Other tree fruit crops were also hurt by the spring
weather. The peach crop was very light, but generally fruit
sized well. The plum crop is light, while apricots
were virtually non-existent. I doubt if Northwest Michigan will
produce more than half a normal apple crop.
Wine grapes are the one crop that appears
to have come through in good shape during this generally disastrous
year. Sunny and warm late summer, early fall weather has been favorable
for grapes. The crop quantity and quality are both looking good.
|
|
 |
Minor-use crop pesticide prioritization
in the 2002 IR-4 Food Use Workshop
John Wise, Annemiek Schilder,
Rufus Isaacs, and Bernard Zandstra
|
Due to the current review of crop protection chemicals
under the Food Quality Protection Act and the high cost to industry
of product registration, minor crops are at risk of having few available
products for pest control. To mitigate this problem, IR-4 (USDA
Interregional Research Project No.4) facilitates pesticide registration
for minor crops by funding residue trials, and more recently, some
performance trials. Minor crop research needs are prioritized each
year during a national workshop.
Research priorities for the Year-2003 residue program
on most fruits, vegetables and herbs grown in the United States
and Canada were assigned at the 26th Food Use Workshop
held Sept. 17-19 in Orlando Florida, while needs for cranberries,
canola, tropical crops, artichokes, clover, grass seeds, hops, mint,
mushroom and beehives, were prioritized separately by people associated
with the respective industries. The workshop was attended by Drs.
Bernard Zandstra, Rufus Isaacs, Robert Hollingsworth, Satoru Miyazaki
and John Wise of Michigan State Univeristy, along with other minor
crop researchers, extension specialists, representatives of commodity
and industry groups across the country, and personnel from EPA,
USDA, and IR-4.
Participants were provided with a complete list
of all pesticides submitted for consideration and as a group they
ranked products based on need, performance, safety, and availability
of alternatives. Only a limited number of projects could be assigned
"A" or "B" priority. An "A" priority allows IR-4 to begin the residue
program immediately the following season, with expectations that
a complete data package be submitted to the EPA within 30 months.
"B" priority projects are funded as resources permit. Projects with
a "C" rating are held in the system for further consideration the
following year. The following list of priority "A" projects is preliminary,
until affirmed at the IR-4 national planning meeting in October.
A complete listing can be found on the IR-4 web-site (www.cook.rutgers.edu/~ir4).
|
Fungicides
Priority A
|
|
|
|
Product
|
Crops
|
Target disease(s)
|
|
FLUAZINAM
|
Blueberry
|
|
|
QUINOXYFEN
|
Peach
|
Powdery Mildew
|
|
Insecticides
Priority A
|
|
|
|
Product
|
Crops
|
Target pest(s)
|
|
INDOXACARB
|
Peach, plum
|
Plum curculio
|
|
BUPROFEZIN
|
Strawberry, Cherry
|
Scale insects
|
|
INDOXACARB
|
Blueberry
|
Plum curculio, cranberry fruitworm
|
|
IMIDACLOPRID
|
Caneberry
|
Aphids, leafhopper, caneborer
|
|
THYMOL
|
Honey and Bees Wax
|
Hive parasites
|
|
Herbicides
Priority A
|
|
|
|
Product
|
Crops
|
Target weed(s)
|
|
FLUMIOXAZIN
|
Blueberry
|
Weeds
|
|
SULFENTRAZONE
|
Strawberry
|
Annual weeds
|
|
|
 |
2003 Noninsured Disaster Assistance
Program
|
Growers of
perennial crops should be contacting their local USDA/Farm Service
Agency Office now if they are planning on paying the service fees
for 2003 NAP crop coverage.
The Noninsured Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) is a risk protection
tool offered to producers of agricultural crops. This program covers
losses to crops when the crop loss exceeds 50 percent of the farm
actual production history.
The application service fee is $100.00 per crop per county, not to
exceed $300.00 per county or $900.00 per producer regardless of how
many counties a producer grows crops in or how many crops are grown.
An example would be a farm has cherries, pears, plums and apricots,
4 crops grown in one county, the maximum fee this individual would
pay is $300.00.
The deadline for completing the application process is November 20,
2002 for perennial crops. Included are apricots, blueberries, cherries,
cranberries, grapes, peaches, pears, plums, raspberries, strawberries,
asparagus, Christmas trees, maple sap, honey, forage crops, and nectarines.
Onions have an application closing date of February 1, 2003.
Farms growing spring-seeded vegetables have until March 15, 2003 to
pay the application fee for spring seeded crops.
May 31, 2003 is the deadline to pay the application fee for Nursery
crops.
For those of you with crop insurance policies, these dates should
already be familiar, as the dates are also the sales closing dates
for purchasing crop insurance policies. Perennials- November 20 and
annual field crops February 15.
It is important to remember these dates do not vary and are not extended.
If crop insurance is offered on the crop in your county NAP is normally
not available.
Please direct questions about the Noninsured Disaster Assistance Program
to your local Farm Service Agency Office.
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
1 - Southwest
Mark Longstroth
Bill Shane
Al Gaus
|
Weather
Cool fall weather has come in with the beginning
of fall. The next week is forecast for cooler temperatures.
GDD totals from March 1 through September
22
|
|
Location
|
GDD 42
|
GDD 45
|
GDD 50
|
|
SWMREC
|
4073
|
3595
|
2850
|
|
Trevor Nichols
|
3737
|
3275
|
2552
|
Insects
Several direct pests are still out. Codling
moth trap catch is still low. It does seem that we will not
have a significant third flight of codling moth. We are still catching
good numbers of Oriental fruit moth. Grape berry moths are still
flying.
Regional insect biofix dates for SWMREC,
updated September 22
|
|
Insect
|
Biofix Date
|
Biofix GDD
|
GDD since Biofix
|
|
Oriental fruit moth
|
May 4, 2002
|
275 GDD45
|
3320
|
|
Codling moth
|
May 28, 2002
|
300 GDD50
|
2550
|
|
Obliquebanded leafroller
|
June 14, 2002
|
875 GDD42
|
3200
|
Tree fruit
Peach harvest is over.
Apple harvest is well underway. Growers and
pickers are making fast work harvesting orchards with only a light
crop. Growers are harvesting Jonathans and early picking Red and
Golden Delicious apples this week. Check the Code-A-Phones in Van
Buren and Berrien to monitor apple maturity. Oriental fruit moth adults
are still flying. Trap catch for codling moth was very
low last week in most orchards but rising in others. Growers need
to maintain protection in their orchards. Damage from worms in the
fruit by both codling moth and Oriental fruit moth is common in
the region. European red mites are
laying their winter eggs.
Small fruit
Blueberry harvest is finished. The flower
buds for next spring are forming.
In grapes, harvest continues. Niagara harvest
ended last week. Concord harvest began Monday, September 23. Grape
GDDs at Lawton from April 1 to September 23 are 2837 base 50. Grape
berry moth pressure has been heavy primarily from mated females
from outside the vineyards laying eggs in the vineyards.
Cranberry harvest has begun.
|
|
 |
2 - Southeast
Bob Tritten
|
Weather
Warmer temperatures over the last two weeks have
not helped color maturing apple varieties. Warm temperatures have
also seemed like they have kept some of the insect activity flying
later in the season than normal. (There are more details on these
insects in the apple section.) Generally, dry soil conditions persist
over most areas of southeast Michigan. Thundershowers late last
week and weekend have brought much needed rain to many growers.
Unfortunately it is too late in the season to help this year's fruit
crops. At many farms newly planted tree fruits and small fruits
are under severe signs of drought stress.
Tree fruits
Apple harvest continues at a slow pace across
the region. Most growers have now finished Gala and have moved on
to Jonathon, however color has been fairly poor in most Jonathon
blocks. Jonagold are now being harvested as well. Golden Delicious
are eating fairly good right now and may be ready for harvest fairly
quickly. Red Delicious are a week to ten days away from being ready
to harvest.
Codling moth trap catches have continued to bounce
around over the last three to four weeks. Generally, adult moth
catches decreased at the end of August and then began to creep up
again in mid-September. It is very possible that a partial third
generation flight is what caused this increase trap catch over the
last few weeks. Codling moth entry holes in fruit are fairly easy
to find at most farms across southeast Michigan. Obliquebanded leafroller
trap catches have been fairly high for this time of year, as have
been Oriental fruit moth trap catches in apple blocks that are adjacent
to peach plantings. European red mite populations have been high
at several farms across the region. They are now beginning to prepare
for winter by laying eggs in the calyx end of apples, under bud
scales and within the bark. White apple leafhopper adult flight
has been troublesome during harvest at many farms.
Small fruits
Fall red raspberry harvest is moving along
fairly well this year. Where irrigation was applied the crop looks
to be fairly typical. However, where irrigation supplies were short
is where I see a fair amount of small berries as well as wilting
of canes on sandy sites.
Blueberry harvest is now wrapped up at all
farms across the region.
|
|
 |
3 - Grand Rapids Area
Phil Schwallier
Amy Irish Brown
Tom Kalchik
Carlos Garcia-Salazar
|
Tree fruit insects
Codling moth trap catches from last week have remained
very low to near zero in many blocks. There most likely will be
a partial third generation this year, but from what we know so far,
it doesn't look as though it will be a large percentage of the second
generation that will emerge. We will continue to monitor through
the next several weeks.
Oriental fruit moth trap catches have been rising,
but numbers in the Grand Rapids area have not been in the range
where feeding damage in apple should be of much concern. I have
seen some small Oriental larvae in late season nectarines.
Obliquebanded leafroller adults continue to fly,
but trap numbers are much declined in most blocks for the second
generation of this pest. Some damage can be found, especially in
clustered fruits. The larvae can be found pretty easily now that
they are getting some size to them. OBLR overwinters as a second
or third instar larvae - these will be the worms we target next
spring.
With all the dry weather for the past month, apple
maggot has not been too active. I wouldn't expect the predicted
rain to cause too much flight this late in the season, but if you're
exporting apples and the protocol calls for apple maggot, you should
continue to monitor traps in these blocks.
Other horticultural topics
Leaf drop in apples still continues and is most
likely due climate conditions we've had this season. If you look
around at other tree species, you will see that maples and other
are dropping leaves now also. Heat stress and water stress will
cause leaves to drop. It should not affect the overall health of
the tree even if they drop 50 percent of their leaves.
Apple maturity
Maturity is moving right
along. Fruit is reported loose by some growers. Brix levels have
been excellent. Maturity is quite variable between fruit.
Honeycrisp - Continue
to color pick. Starch levels are clearing out daily. Heavy trees
still have green fruit. Next week, Honeycrisp will be moving into
short-term harvest window.
Gala - Continue to color
pick. Ethylene levels have been high for two weeks. All samples
are ready for harvest. Gala is starting to develop a waxy feel.
McIntosh - Some early
sites are ready. Color needs to improve. Firmness is starting to
decline. Starch levels are just moving into long term CA harvest
window. Watch out for fruit drop.
Cortland - They are
still immature, but Ethylene is starting to move and firmness is
declining. Harvest next week.
Empire - Fruits are
still immature but starting to change. First harvest will probably
be late next week. Watch firmness if for export.
Jonathan - Our first
sample is close to maturity. Jonathan on early sites will be ready
probably about late September.
|
|
 |
5 - Northwest
Gary Thornton
Jim Nugent
Jim Bardenhagen
Duke Elsner
|
Tree fruit
Peach harvest is complete.
Plums are being harvested; crop is very light.
Apple harvest is underway but mostly limited
to pre-McIntosh varieties. Ginger Gold harvest is complete. Honeycrisps
are being selectively harvested, with maturity less consistent than
normal in Northwest Michigan, requiring multiple pickings. Mac harvest
is underway for processing and just beginning for fresh, though
the crop is very light. Apples being harvested so far without irrigation
have not sized too well in some areas.
Early defoliation from cherry leaf spot is
very common at this time, particularly in the tops of trees, in
both tart and sweet cherries.
Small fruit
Wine grape harvest is getting started. Rot
pressure has been relatively low to date.
|
|
 |
Weather news
Jeff Andresen
Agricultural Meteorology
Geography
|
During the past week, major changes to the upper
airflow across North America have taken place, resulting in a broad
trough of low pressure across the Great Lakes region (A high pressure
ridge had persisted across the region during much of late August
and early September.). This trough will bring cooler, more seasonable
temperatures and frequent chances for precipitation during the next
week or two. Look for high temperatures near or slightly below climatological
norms with highs ranging from the 60's to low 70's on most days
and lows in the upper 30's to mid-40's. Given relatively dry soils
in many sections of the state, frost is a possibility should clear,
calm conditions develop on any given evening. Climatologically,
the first freezing temperatures of the fall season have occurred
by the end of September in much of the Upper Peninsula, and across
interior sections of northern and central Lower Michigan.
In the medium-range outlooks, the NOAA 6-10 and 8-14 day outlooks for September
29 through October 3 and October 1-7 both call for the upper air
troughing pattern to continue with below normal temperatures expected
in both time frames. Precipitation in the 6-10 day period is forecast
to remain near to below normal while in the 8-14 day period the
outlook calls for above normal totals statewide.
Further ahead, the new NOAA Climate Prediction Center
long lead outlook for October continues to call for the even odds,
"climatology" scenario of equal odds of below-, near-, and above
normal temperatures and precipitation statewide. For the three-month
October through December period and following winter/early spring
months, however, the outlooks strongly follow the statistical composite
of previous El Nino years, as warmer than normal sea surface temperatures
in the equatorial Pacific signal the early stages of a weak to moderate
El Nino event. During most El Nino episodes, milder than normal
winter and early spring (2003) temperatures are common across the
northern U.S. including Michigan. Precipitation for the same time
frames is expected to be below normal or in the equal odds-climatology
category statewide.
|
|
| Back
to top |